lekt player

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

jesuscheung wrote:in asio4all, the min size is 64. i can play it.

in asus native asio driver, i can select 1ms. i can play it too.
and what is result with v2.94 abs?
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:in asio4all, the min size is 64. i can play it.

in asus native asio driver, i can select 1ms. i can play it too.
and what is result with v2.94 abs?
same as goon heaven..

can play 133. cannot play 132.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

JC, why in my case size 288 seems best, much more soft/vibration than others sizes. could you test 288, Pro Audio clockrate 10000.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

no no... not good, bad effect. too smooth/blur = false vibration.
still min size 160 is best again for me.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote:no no... not good, bad effect. too smooth/blur = false vibration.
still min size 160 is best again for me.
160/320/640 is best. pkshan is never wrong with tweaks
you have luck!

audiofire stops making soundcard... it should support 160.
american company?
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

my onboard laptop

Wave format in file is smaller than a WAVEFORMATEX; will zero-pad the last 2 byt
es.
The default period for this device is 30000 hundred-nanoseconds, or 132 frames.
Trying again with periodicity of 36281 hundred-nanoseconds, or 160 frames.
We ended up with a period of 36281 hns or 160 frames.

160 is the king
resolution + quality
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote: but i only love v2.93 160 style (and v2.93 352 also), slowly/silently tempo. deep feeling. not power/energy as CD sound. although its SQ not good as r2. sometime no need too passion i listen v2.93 160.
...
i think 2.93x is very passionate
some vocal feels like first love whispering sweetly near the ear...
a lot to handle haha

think we need to go back to rock and roll style of 2.90x or 2.4.3
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

hey goon heaven!!

can you test clockrate=89796?

if you soundcard is like mind, this clockrate should be godlike.

the effect is same as upgrading your speaker cables or whatever.
EVERYTHING BETTER
User avatar
goon-heaven
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by goon-heaven »

jesuscheung wrote:hey goon heaven!!

can you test clockrate=89796?

if you soundcard is like mind, this clockrate should be godlike.

the effect is same as upgrading your speaker cables or whatever.
EVERYTHING BETTER
Thanks JC! - another miracle! Can you offer an explanation as to why?
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

goon-heaven wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:hey goon heaven!!

can you test clockrate=89796?

if you soundcard is like mind, this clockrate should be godlike.

the effect is same as upgrading your speaker cables or whatever.
EVERYTHING BETTER
Thanks JC! - another miracle! Can you offer an explanation as to why?
are you sure? do more testing haha

132*3/44100 = 89796

*3 because i saw pkshan does the same thing to his dac

his dac is best at 640

640*6/44100 = 87075

multiple too much clockrate becomes 6 digits. things start to go wrong
Post Reply