and what is result with v2.94 abs?jesuscheung wrote:in asio4all, the min size is 64. i can play it.
in asus native asio driver, i can select 1ms. i can play it too.
lekt player
Re: lekt player
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
same as goon heaven..lekt wrote:and what is result with v2.94 abs?jesuscheung wrote:in asio4all, the min size is 64. i can play it.
in asus native asio driver, i can select 1ms. i can play it too.
can play 133. cannot play 132.
Re: lekt player
JC, why in my case size 288 seems best, much more soft/vibration than others sizes. could you test 288, Pro Audio clockrate 10000.
Re: lekt player
no no... not good, bad effect. too smooth/blur = false vibration.
still min size 160 is best again for me.
still min size 160 is best again for me.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
160/320/640 is best. pkshan is never wrong with tweakslekt wrote:no no... not good, bad effect. too smooth/blur = false vibration.
still min size 160 is best again for me.
you have luck!
audiofire stops making soundcard... it should support 160.
american company?
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
my onboard laptop
Wave format in file is smaller than a WAVEFORMATEX; will zero-pad the last 2 byt
es.
The default period for this device is 30000 hundred-nanoseconds, or 132 frames.
Trying again with periodicity of 36281 hundred-nanoseconds, or 160 frames.
We ended up with a period of 36281 hns or 160 frames.
160 is the king
resolution + quality
Wave format in file is smaller than a WAVEFORMATEX; will zero-pad the last 2 byt
es.
The default period for this device is 30000 hundred-nanoseconds, or 132 frames.
Trying again with periodicity of 36281 hundred-nanoseconds, or 160 frames.
We ended up with a period of 36281 hns or 160 frames.
160 is the king
resolution + quality
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
i think 2.93x is very passionatelekt wrote: but i only love v2.93 160 style (and v2.93 352 also), slowly/silently tempo. deep feeling. not power/energy as CD sound. although its SQ not good as r2. sometime no need too passion i listen v2.93 160.
...
some vocal feels like first love whispering sweetly near the ear...
a lot to handle haha
think we need to go back to rock and roll style of 2.90x or 2.4.3
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
hey goon heaven!!
can you test clockrate=89796?
if you soundcard is like mind, this clockrate should be godlike.
the effect is same as upgrading your speaker cables or whatever.
EVERYTHING BETTER
can you test clockrate=89796?
if you soundcard is like mind, this clockrate should be godlike.
the effect is same as upgrading your speaker cables or whatever.
EVERYTHING BETTER
- goon-heaven
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: lekt player
Thanks JC! - another miracle! Can you offer an explanation as to why?jesuscheung wrote:hey goon heaven!!
can you test clockrate=89796?
if you soundcard is like mind, this clockrate should be godlike.
the effect is same as upgrading your speaker cables or whatever.
EVERYTHING BETTER
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
are you sure? do more testing hahagoon-heaven wrote:Thanks JC! - another miracle! Can you offer an explanation as to why?jesuscheung wrote:hey goon heaven!!
can you test clockrate=89796?
if you soundcard is like mind, this clockrate should be godlike.
the effect is same as upgrading your speaker cables or whatever.
EVERYTHING BETTER
132*3/44100 = 89796
*3 because i saw pkshan does the same thing to his dac
his dac is best at 640
640*6/44100 = 87075
multiple too much clockrate becomes 6 digits. things start to go wrong