MQN
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: MQN
in my opinion, if you can bear the bad treble tune, 2.82 has the best piano on earth.
one can totally tell how the pianist presses each note.
finger drop, press, flow, body, weight. all real+live. exactly it is.
maybe not hifi quality. music quality is beyond.
no software comes close, apart from certain mqn versions.
one can totally tell how the pianist presses each note.
finger drop, press, flow, body, weight. all real+live. exactly it is.
maybe not hifi quality. music quality is beyond.
no software comes close, apart from certain mqn versions.
Re: MQN
Don't agree with JC at all on this one, but each can make up his own mind.
BTW vinyl type of sound is no target to aim for.
Cheers
Aleg
BTW vinyl type of sound is no target to aim for.
Cheers
Aleg
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
Re: MQN
R2.82 sse2 + avx (don't get confused), down to 6kb, hopefully more of everything for everyone. Guarantee you won't hear another player that sounds like this.
The only thing left to do would be to break the wasapi code down to c or change to kernel streaming.
The only thing left to do would be to break the wasapi code down to c or change to kernel streaming.
Re: MQN
Can't find the right words to describe how good is 2.82! Music is everywhere.sbgk wrote:2.82 is a richer experience so might suit. Very tuneful and detailed.nige2000 wrote:prefered the 2.81 vp 0x0 again
didn't get testing 2.82 yet
PC: CPU Q8400, 8GB Ram, Windows 8.1 x64
DAC: HRT Music Streamer II+, Asus Xonar Essence ST (+ HiEnd DYI upgrades)
DAC: HRT Music Streamer II+, Asus Xonar Essence ST (+ HiEnd DYI upgrades)
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: MQN
wow...!
R2.82 avx + R1.6 = old mqn.exe2.82
old mqn.exe2.82 has longer duration in notes.
overall musicality is the same.
R2.82 is higher res! more aggressive. more forward sounding
old mqn.exe2.82 is more lay back and natural.
only wish R2.82 can have as much depth in vocal/notes...
still prefer old mqn.exe2.82.
(with all new versions, doesn't anyone else think there is strain in music? takes a few mins to detect with headphones. with speakers, 30 mins is needed to strain my ears to rest)
R2.82 avx + R1.6 = old mqn.exe2.82
old mqn.exe2.82 has longer duration in notes.
overall musicality is the same.
R2.82 is higher res! more aggressive. more forward sounding
old mqn.exe2.82 is more lay back and natural.
only wish R2.82 can have as much depth in vocal/notes...
still prefer old mqn.exe2.82.
(with all new versions, doesn't anyone else think there is strain in music? takes a few mins to detect with headphones. with speakers, 30 mins is needed to strain my ears to rest)
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: MQN
R2.83 > R2.82
more natural
actually, R2.83 is the best of all R2.X?!
strain seems much much less in R2.83
micro-details is very refined.
rich airy transparent sound supported by clean bass!
while texture seems kept to a decent level
emotion is as good as 100000
if possible, vocal depth needs +1%
more natural
actually, R2.83 is the best of all R2.X?!
strain seems much much less in R2.83
micro-details is very refined.
rich airy transparent sound supported by clean bass!
while texture seems kept to a decent level
emotion is as good as 100000
if possible, vocal depth needs +1%