lekt player
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
keep update3. don't change.
i have to relearn the sound with update4 or vs2013. they have different vibration.
difficult for test hehe
i have to relearn the sound with update4 or vs2013. they have different vibration.
difficult for test hehe
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
i start to notice lekt players with high vibration requires highly tuned OS. OS must be very very free and non-intense. otherwise, tune goes wrong.
i listen older versions of high vibration, they sound much better than i remember.
think i prefer s8 over s9. shall see. now difficult to make quick judgement.
i listen older versions of high vibration, they sound much better than i remember.
think i prefer s8 over s9. shall see. now difficult to make quick judgement.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
think s8's vocal is recent best. emotion, natural, details, smoothness, free(zero-intense)- all top of top for vocal.
Re: lekt player
seems s9 need improve bass and drum weight, but only little. not sure, will more test its sound.
Re: lekt player
yes, s8 is most correct focus, everything sounds in its focus, so intense ~0. vocal very good.jesuscheung wrote:think s8's vocal is recent best. emotion, natural, details, smoothness, free(zero-intense)- all top of top for vocal.
s9 focus not good as s8
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
identified another OS jitter. s8 just reflecting it. time to fix this hehe...jesuscheung wrote: .....
for some vocal, or sound of high density/concentration:
vibration quantity is high. size is norm. not enough room fit all the vibration. tune changes to less good.
for sound of normal density/concentration:
tune is fine.
.....
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
s8 and s9 are very very close in quality. style little different.
s8 vibration% is higher. sound is more smooth more easy.
s9 feels like 2.72. tune not stable like s8. like 2.72, it produces sound human cannot hear. feels special. also more air.
not sure which is correct. still prefer s8 a little more.
(yesterday, disabled memory remap in bios. all things vibrate too much. that's why s8 went wrong yesterday)
s8 vibration% is higher. sound is more smooth more easy.
s9 feels like 2.72. tune not stable like s8. like 2.72, it produces sound human cannot hear. feels special. also more air.
not sure which is correct. still prefer s8 a little more.
(yesterday, disabled memory remap in bios. all things vibrate too much. that's why s8 went wrong yesterday)
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
i actually think differently. s9 has good duet. e.g. piano duet (2 people playing)lekt wrote: s9 focus not good as s8
background + foreground work quite well together. (need more soundstage depth)
s8 is clearly very good single focus.
old mqn like i think it was 2.36/2.40 is multi-focus. all instruments work on their own. not together. not good.
Last edited by jesuscheung on Sat Mar 01, 2014 9:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
2.40.1
2.72
2.75.1 s4
2.75.1 s5
2.75.1 s8
2.75.1 s9
all my favorites. all micro-difference in musicality. need time to understand everything hehe
think s8 and s9 most correct in general.
2.72
2.75.1 s4
2.75.1 s5
2.75.1 s8
2.75.1 s9
all my favorites. all micro-difference in musicality. need time to understand everything hehe
think s8 and s9 most correct in general.
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: lekt player
s8 had been too much pressure for my downclocked RAM...
just increased RAM speed in bios. now s8's vibration is a piece of cake! make more vibration pls! thx lekt
i wonder if you can push my RAM to overclocking! hehe
just increased RAM speed in bios. now s8's vibration is a piece of cake! make more vibration pls! thx lekt
i wonder if you can push my RAM to overclocking! hehe