lekt player

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

keep update3. don't change.

i have to relearn the sound with update4 or vs2013. they have different vibration.
difficult for test hehe
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

i start to notice lekt players with high vibration requires highly tuned OS. OS must be very very free and non-intense. otherwise, tune goes wrong.

i listen older versions of high vibration, they sound much better than i remember.

think i prefer s8 over s9. shall see. now difficult to make quick judgement.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

think s8's vocal is recent best. emotion, natural, details, smoothness, free(zero-intense)- all top of top for vocal.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

seems s9 need improve bass and drum weight, but only little. not sure, will more test its sound.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

jesuscheung wrote:think s8's vocal is recent best. emotion, natural, details, smoothness, free(zero-intense)- all top of top for vocal.
yes, s8 is most correct focus, everything sounds in its focus, so intense ~0. vocal very good.

s9 focus not good as s8
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

jesuscheung wrote: .....
for some vocal, or sound of high density/concentration:
vibration quantity is high. size is norm. not enough room fit all the vibration. tune changes to less good.

for sound of normal density/concentration:
tune is fine.
.....
identified another OS jitter. s8 just reflecting it. time to fix this hehe...
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

s8 and s9 are very very close in quality. style little different.

s8 vibration% is higher. sound is more smooth more easy.

s9 feels like 2.72. tune not stable like s8. like 2.72, it produces sound human cannot hear. feels special. also more air.

not sure which is correct. still prefer s8 a little more.

(yesterday, disabled memory remap in bios. all things vibrate too much. that's why s8 went wrong yesterday)
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote: s9 focus not good as s8
i actually think differently. s9 has good duet. e.g. piano duet (2 people playing)
background + foreground work quite well together. (need more soundstage depth)

s8 is clearly very good single focus.

old mqn like i think it was 2.36/2.40 is multi-focus. all instruments work on their own. not together. not good.
Last edited by jesuscheung on Sat Mar 01, 2014 9:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

2.40.1
2.72
2.75.1 s4
2.75.1 s5
2.75.1 s8
2.75.1 s9

all my favorites. all micro-difference in musicality. need time to understand everything hehe
think s8 and s9 most correct in general.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

s8 had been too much pressure for my downclocked RAM...
just increased RAM speed in bios. now s8's vibration is a piece of cake! make more vibration pls! thx lekt

i wonder if you can push my RAM to overclocking! hehe
Post Reply