lekt player

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

did you change to clockrate back to normal?
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

uploaded 2.29.1 mod
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

2.29.1 better! soundstage is fine is better!
-piano flows very well. better! notes need more crispy, more texture. pianist left hand(lower volume hand) needs less mellow.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:no nothing. close the thing. everything is restored.
ah, sound is weird in my laptop, very difficult detect difference of sounds. i don't know why.
getting into winter? temperature is cold? i do notice sound change in my setup too. sound doesn't feel as powerful as summer. weird.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

jesuscheung wrote:2.29.1 better! soundstage is fine is better!
-piano flows very well. better! notes need more crispy, more texture. pianist left hand(lower volume hand) needs less mellow.
yesterday restored Pro Audio to 10000.
classical piano have many quiet notes, high technical playing can create many musical nuances. if soundstage and vibration are not good then these notes will be bad, even dumb. bad software player can't reproduce these notes.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:2.29.1 better! soundstage is fine is better!
-piano flows very well. better! notes need more crispy, more texture. pianist left hand(lower volume hand) needs less mellow.
yesterday restored Pro Audio to 10000.
classical piano have many quiet notes, high technical playing can create many musical nuances. if soundstage and vibration are not good then these notes will be bad, even dumb. bad software player can't reproduce these notes.
2.29.1 already flows better than mqn2.82. i heard more texture from mqn2.82 so i think it is possible. 2.82 is too bright on heavy notes.

ignoring the texture, 2.29.1 is pretty flawless in piano.
Last edited by jesuscheung on Thu Nov 14, 2013 11:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

jesuscheung wrote:getting into winter? temperature is cold? i do notice sound change in my setup too. sound doesn't feel as powerful as summer. weird.
i think humidity of air, sound wave is good on good weather days.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt, you don't use any hardware prefetch, right?

i am seriously considering disabling "adjacent cache line prefetch" in bios. so much better sound with lekt player.

too mellow with "adjacent cache line prefetch". disable it, more revealing. piano is 99% perfect. treble is 5% better.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

jesuscheung wrote:lekt, you don't use any hardware prefetch, right?

i am seriously considering disabling "adjacent cache line prefetch" in bios. so much better sound with lekt player.

too mellow with "adjacent cache line prefetch". disable it, more revealing. piano is 99% perfect. treble is 5% better.
in my bios setup not prefetch, where is it? show me pls.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:lekt, you don't use any hardware prefetch, right?

i am seriously considering disabling "adjacent cache line prefetch" in bios. so much better sound with lekt player.

too mellow with "adjacent cache line prefetch". disable it, more revealing. piano is 99% perfect. treble is 5% better.
in my bios setup not prefetch, where is it? show me pls.
oh... maybe you don't have.
viewtopic.php?f=15&t=2456&start=50
at about the 8th picture.
Post Reply