Single Ended -v- Balanced interconnects

Post Reply
User avatar
Rocker
Posts: 565
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 3:59 pm

Single Ended -v- Balanced interconnects

Post by Rocker »

I simply cannot get my head around the 'differences', if any, between Single Ended and Balanced interconnects on my Hi-Fi system. Both work on my system, the balanced connections are more positive [locking on one end] than the Single Ended. Sonic differences?? Not sure but I think the SE is slightly more upbeat than balanced.

What I hope to learn is the whys of balanced. Technical guys will know the answer but, to save typing, perhaps a URL to a good online explanation is what I need. Thanks.
It's OK, if there is no bread I will eat cake.

Beware of a thin chef!
User avatar
Ivor
Posts: 4259
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:21 pm

Re: Single Ended -v- Balanced interconnects

Post by Ivor »

I've always assumed balanced interconnects were more of a studio standard rather than domestic, I have doubts about their benefits in the home, certainly I've never heard a difference.
Vinyl -anything else is data storage.

Thorens TD124 Mk1 + Kuzma Stogi 12"arm, HANA Red, Gold Note PH 10 + PSU. ADI-2 Dac, Lector CDP7, Wyred4Sound pre, Airtight ATM1s, Klipsch Heresy IV, Misc Mains, RCA + XLR ICs, Ansuz P2 Speaker cable
jkeny
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 9:37 pm

Re: Single Ended -v- Balanced interconnects

Post by jkeny »

Quick answer - the main benefit is to balanced where the signal to noise ratio should be better i.e stronger signal above the noise floor.
TRUE balanced operation should cancel out noise i.e distortion signals that are synchronous on both signal lines.
A lot of equipment doesn't implement balanced circuitry correctly so this cancellation of certain distortions & noise reduction is not that effective.

Edit: Yes, as Ivor says, studios use balanced quite a lot so as to avoid the noise which would be inherent in the long signal leads that are often necessary in studios
www.Ciunas.biz
For Digital Audio playback that delivers WHERE the performers are on stage but more importantly WHY they are there.
User avatar
Diapason
Posts: 4145
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:51 am

Re: Single Ended -v- Balanced interconnects

Post by Diapason »

Have to say, there's a clear difference on my stuff, with balanced providing a much more open sound to my ears. That said, it seems to be very component-specific.
Nerdcave: ...is no more! :(
Sitting Room: Wadia 581SE - Rega Planar 3/AT VM95ML & SH - Bluesound Node II - Copland CSA 100 - Audioplan Kontrast 3
Kitchen: WiiM Pro - Wadia 151 - B&W 685s2
User avatar
Ivor
Posts: 4259
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:21 pm

Re: Single Ended -v- Balanced interconnects

Post by Ivor »

Diapason wrote:Have to say, there's a clear difference on my stuff, with balanced providing a much more open sound to my ears. That said, it seems to be very component-specific.
There will always be gear that's designed to provide and accept a balanced signal but too often it's tacked on as an afterthought.
If it improves your system then retain it!
Vinyl -anything else is data storage.

Thorens TD124 Mk1 + Kuzma Stogi 12"arm, HANA Red, Gold Note PH 10 + PSU. ADI-2 Dac, Lector CDP7, Wyred4Sound pre, Airtight ATM1s, Klipsch Heresy IV, Misc Mains, RCA + XLR ICs, Ansuz P2 Speaker cable
sebna
Posts: 224
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:59 pm

Re: Single Ended -v- Balanced interconnects

Post by sebna »

It would be same for me as for Diapason, but it probably helps that my system is balanced all the way from source through pre to amplification.

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
i5@800mhz haswell, 16gb @800mhz, H87 mb with PPA TCXO, PPA V1 USB
no storage of any kind, SATA disabled in BIOS, RAMos, W2012 R2, AO 1.26, MQN
Teradak ATX LPSU 210W & 5v LPSU for clean 5v to DAC
Meitner MA-1, Primare Pre30 + A33.2, Zingali HM 2.10+
sima66
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:35 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Single Ended -v- Balanced interconnects

Post by sima66 »

jkeny wrote:Quick answer - the main benefit is to balanced where the signal to noise ratio should be better i.e stronger signal above the noise floor.
TRUE balanced operation should cancel out noise i.e distortion signals that are synchronous on both signal lines.
A lot of equipment doesn't implement balanced circuitry correctly so this cancellation of certain distortions & noise reduction is not that effective.

Edit: Yes, as Ivor says, studios use balanced quite a lot so as to avoid the noise which would be inherent in the long signal leads that are often necessary in studios
Agree with John that is equipment dependant, if is a true balanced
My previous Karan preamp and the current Wadia highly recommend use of balanced cables. The sad part is that mu amps are single ended and never got the chance to compare myself! :(
I5 4440+TXCOmobo+JCAT Femto-Intona-JKRegen+HynesPS+TeraDak ATX-820W=JCATusb=DiverterHR=Wadia 931/922(GNSC mod)=PassLabsXA100.5=2xValhalla=Stacked&moded ESL57+JAS SuperTweet+2MJ Acoustics Ref.I
4SteinHarmonizers;RR777;Tellus;StillpointsUltraSS
meep
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:13 pm

Re: Single Ended -v- Balanced interconnects

Post by meep »

You may also find, all else being equal, that phono vs xlr connections will result in slightly different levels of gain. You'd need to check your system specs to be sure.
Post Reply