+1!!Aleg wrote:once upon a time, I was fluent in VI, thirty odd years ago :-(Diapason wrote:Pshaw that's far too easy. If we're staying in the spirit of the forum it has to be VI.
MQN
Re: MQN
Maplin XM21X 12V float charging A123 26650 LiFePO4 battery/Maxwell Supercap PSU for Mitac PD10-BI J1900 Bay Trail, WTFPlay, Hiface Evo, Bow Technologies 1704 NOS DAC, StereoKnight TVC, Quad II monoblocks, ZU Audio Druid Mk4/Method Sub
Re: MQN
Surely emacs rather than vi !!Diapason wrote:Pshaw that's far too easy. If we're staying in the spirit of the forum it has to be VI.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Editor_war
"Change is Possible" [Parking Meter in Dundrum Shopping Centre]
Re: MQN
I thought Fryderck had cracked the unix thing? Remember people being bowled over by his laptop linux os with minimal player
GroupBuySD DAC/First Watt AlephJ/NigeAmp/Audio PC's/Lampi L4.5 Dac/ Groupbuy AD1862 DHT Dac /Quad ESL63's.Tannoy Legacy Cheviots.
Re: MQN
Any chance of a link to it?tony wrote:I thought Fryderck had cracked the unix thing? Remember people being bowled over by his laptop linux os with minimal player
Thanks
Maplin XM21X 12V float charging A123 26650 LiFePO4 battery/Maxwell Supercap PSU for Mitac PD10-BI J1900 Bay Trail, WTFPlay, Hiface Evo, Bow Technologies 1704 NOS DAC, StereoKnight TVC, Quad II monoblocks, ZU Audio Druid Mk4/Method Sub
Re: MQN
No sound at all...sbgk wrote:uploaded 8.54, updated version based on 8.16 so should work for everyone. Listening to it, it sounds great.
PC: CPU Q8400, 8GB Ram, Windows 8.1 x64
DAC: HRT Music Streamer II+, Asus Xonar Essence ST (+ HiEnd DYI upgrades)
DAC: HRT Music Streamer II+, Asus Xonar Essence ST (+ HiEnd DYI upgrades)
Re: MQN
Just plays fine here, as is 8.55.John Dot wrote:No sound at all...sbgk wrote:uploaded 8.54, updated version based on 8.16 so should work for everyone. Listening to it, it sounds great.
Don't feel it is an upgrade to 8.51 though apart from solving the vinyl like ticks
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
Re: MQN
My previous reference was 8.16 Normal. 8.54 Normal has def taken over as my new reference. Outstanding detail but warmth.Aleg wrote:Just plays fine here, as is 8.55.John Dot wrote:No sound at all...sbgk wrote:uploaded 8.54, updated version based on 8.16 so should work for everyone. Listening to it, it sounds great.
Don't feel it is an upgrade to 8.51 though apart from solving the vinyl like ticks
Can 16/44.1 get any better than this? Well probably, but difficult to believe.
Jonathan
Maplin XM21X 12V float charging A123 26650 LiFePO4 battery/Maxwell Supercap PSU for Mitac PD10-BI J1900 Bay Trail, WTFPlay, Hiface Evo, Bow Technologies 1704 NOS DAC, StereoKnight TVC, Quad II monoblocks, ZU Audio Druid Mk4/Method Sub
Re: MQN
8.57 is same code as 8.55 with optimised alignment, makes a difference.
I'm going to say that as a result of the improved alignment the timing is bang on, just sounds right.
seems alignment is more important than i'd realised, listen to 8.58.
8.59 seems optimal, like hearing a guitar in tune, it just sings.
in assembly the code before a loop is read each time it loops round, so it's not only important to have the start of the loop aligned it's also important which instruction is before the loop, would you believe. That's the only difference between 8.58 and 8.59 if you want proof (you'll have to use your ears though).
wonder if anyone would be interested in using mqn for recording music, would it have the same effect as heard in playback.
I'm going to say that as a result of the improved alignment the timing is bang on, just sounds right.
seems alignment is more important than i'd realised, listen to 8.58.
8.59 seems optimal, like hearing a guitar in tune, it just sings.
in assembly the code before a loop is read each time it loops round, so it's not only important to have the start of the loop aligned it's also important which instruction is before the loop, would you believe. That's the only difference between 8.58 and 8.59 if you want proof (you'll have to use your ears though).
wonder if anyone would be interested in using mqn for recording music, would it have the same effect as heard in playback.