lekt player

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote:v3.35 xx bass and focus not good, seems stack have misused. but interesting, treble improved.

optimized code of v3.34.2 256 sub and uploaded:
v3.36 256
v3.36.1 256 nop
v3.36.2 256 jmp

i think they are better. i like its softness, mellow of nop and jmp. try compare.
first impression jmp is best. treble seems kept and bass is restored from 3.35x

tempo is very steady, or too steady?
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

listen a bit more this morning... jmp is almost there if vocal raises up more
maybe coz bass is still a bit "hard" or something`

new favorite again!

----
now i stop the internet, close laptop lid and mouse and everything
the micro details reaches a new level
need to go to work...

ok... earphone takes 15mins to burn in... now i can feel the bass emotion, so so so good
really need to go now hehe
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

yes, jmp can good sound if run in clean OS, many things are best.
also feel steady tempo. but if too steady then sound will become hard. will learn more this code, maybe code can be improved.
User avatar
goon-heaven
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by goon-heaven »

Jmp is good but "explosive dynamics" like cymbal attacks feel slightly constrained, tame. But that could be partly from wanting cleaner electricity and OS.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

was very busy last week, just only now have time to touch code.

uploaded:
v3.37 256
v3.37.1 256
v3.37.2 256 rdx

prefer live sound of v3.37.2 256 rdx, good vocal. live and organic sound but why softness lesser than others.
try them.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote:was very busy last week, just only now have time to touch code.

uploaded:
v3.37 256
v3.37.1 256
v3.37.2 256 rdx

prefer live sound of v3.37.2 256 rdx, good vocal. live and organic sound but why softness lesser than others.
try them.
3.37.2 has organic. lacks some quantity -> dry
3.37 has richer softer sound, more mid. organic very little lesser

need 3.37.2 + 3.37

3.37 new favorite here

(3.37.1 is drier than 3.37 and less organic than 3.37.2)
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

yes, v3.37 better. its softness better, bass focus more correct.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

uploaded v3.37.3 256

vibration improved, seems other good things has kept from v3.37
i like this softness, sound more clarity.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote:uploaded v3.37.3 256

vibration improved, seems other good things has kept from v3.37
i like this softness, sound more clarity.
also like this sound. mostly better than 3.37. new favorite here

tempo is best of lekt
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

my laptop is in super good mood today. 3.37.3 bass is just superb, soft and tight, and vocal has such strong bass emotion... though mid seems a bit thin

(seems like 8.1 sounds better everyday... maybe superfetch does " improves system performance over time.")
Post Reply