lekt player

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

ntdll.dll win8: 1.74MB, win8.1: 1.65MB, win10: 1.46MB, there's MS optimises everyday. we will go to win11, JC, if its "metro" component is less, hehe...
User avatar
goon-heaven
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by goon-heaven »

lekt wrote:
goon-heaven wrote:Hey lekt - what is your OS? (easier to ask than plough back through millions of posts)
win8 pro. think win8 and ws2012 can compromise coz they share syscall numbers, but win8.1 and ws2012R2 use different numbers, = (number of win8) + 1. trying build good version, so then will build it for your win8.1/ws2012R2. but still not good builded, last methods seems not good as i hope.
how do you think, win8.1/ws2012R2 better than win8/ws2012 ? maybe i will install win8.1, but JC use ws2012, hehe...
Is that 32bit or 64bit?

I prefer cleaner SQ of 2012R2 > 2012, but difference is less that differences between your builds.

I think it is important we get on same OS generation, less distraction for you Lekt - you have much work to bypass high level API wrappers.

As you and JC are on win8/ws2012, I will build 2012 onto another USB stick - dont want to miss the fun - tee-hee.

Let me know if you decide to move to win8.1/ws2012R2.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

goon-heaven wrote:...As you and JC are on win8/ws2012, I will build 2012 onto another USB stick - dont want to miss the fun - tee-hee...
good news, goon-heaven, we will with you discover some advantage of low level/syscall mechanism. here's also tricks of registers and stack, so i can use this benefit in code (returned registers values and some stack memory area also are fixed for almost api and syscall function calling, need use this benefit, espesially in render loop). pls. learn win10 sound, if good then maybe we will go to it on summer... (just only have seen important dll code of win10 more protected, more difficult understand its code, hehe...)
User avatar
goon-heaven
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by goon-heaven »

Excellent plan.

and my Server 2015-6? USB stick is ready and waiting... tee-hee
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

yes, wait for win10!

forgotten to mention 3.27x has the most refined sound of all lekt
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

uploaded:
lekt.exe v3.28 256 avx
lekt.exe v3.28.1 256 avx

avx copy 32 bytes once by instruction. seems sound stage more correct, but more raw sound. there's need will be optimized code.
try them.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

........damn it, cpu no support avx here
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

uploaded:
lekt.exe v3.29 256
lekt.exe v3.29.1 256 coex

sound more refined, coex have good energy. how difficult improve vibration, all things easy becomes false effect. try test coex, maybe better than v3.29 ?
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote:uploaded:
lekt.exe v3.29 256
lekt.exe v3.29.1 256 coex

sound more refined, coex have good energy. how difficult improve vibration, all things easy becomes false effect. try test coex, maybe better than v3.29 ?
3.29.1 256 coex > 3.29

3.29 seems like some micro is lost. may coz compressed sound
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

i feel v3.29 256 sound have good presentation, almost things in norm, will try more test.
Post Reply