lekt player

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

3 last versions v3.12.x, v3.13 not good as i think, sound a bit compressed.

uploaded:
lekt.exe v3.14 256 rbx
lekt.exe v3.14 256 qword
lekt.exe v3.14 256 qword2

interesting tricks with opcode, was modify code on runtime, so then all wasapi's function pointers (and other things) in playing loop use constant values instead of variables. maybe sound better, try them.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

quickly tried 3.14 256 rbx. loving it. not the usual lekt sound. need listen listen
User avatar
goon-heaven
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by goon-heaven »

I like qword2 - seems to be more organic and involving, have more energy and slightly more detail - new favorite.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

have tried new method for v3.14.x, think they can be more improved. prefer this method, create code on runtime and manage it, much benefit.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote:have tried new method for v3.14.x, think they can be more improved. prefer this method, create code on runtime and manage it, much benefit.
3.14 is a step forward. seems all things improve. only tempo/pace accuracy is lesser here
prefer rbx here. has added it to my fovorites

----
prefer qword2 now it sounds much better today!
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

yes, v3.14 256 qword2 have more good things here, like its energy. need improve this code, still have little defect.

from v3.10 256 lekt player doesn't use C-library functions of msvcr120.dll, so then no need install Visual C++ Redistributable Packages for Visual Studio 2013. But i feel using C-library makes sound more warm, only not clean as using functions from kernel32.dll. not sure.
User avatar
goon-heaven
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by goon-heaven »

Thanks for the great news on not having to install C-lib - 1 less clutter in winRAM.

Clean fuctions only please - but best function may be no function that you havent written yourself, hee-hee.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

goon-heaven wrote:Thanks for the great news on not having to install C-lib - 1 less clutter in winRAM.

Clean fuctions only please - but best function may be no function that you havent written yourself, hee-hee.
still use kernel32.dll, here's calling function latency coz it call ntdll.dll, need use ntdll.dll and more low level.

uploaded:
lekt.exe v3.15 256 heap16
lekt.exe v3.15.1 256 qword3
lekt.exe v3.15.2 256 rbx2

sound more clean, slightly different.
heap16 use new loop, seem more raw, analog. it have potential, code can be optimized later. try them and compare.
User avatar
goon-heaven
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by goon-heaven »

I tried easiest first
and qword3 is my new cleanest favorite. EXCELLENT!

Will compare against heap16 & rbx2 tomorrow..
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

heap16 has more solid sound i never heard before! focus falls back a little.
qword3 is cleaner sound.

prefer rbx2 here. like the bass. not rich like heap16. rbx2 has non-hard sound for all frequencies. better focus

heap16 has potential. more like real sound. rbx2 and qword3 much thinner sounding comparatively
Post Reply