MQN

[jesuscheung]

v93 0.005 is goood

possible to push buffer lower?
let's say 64/44100=about 1.5ms

[nige2000]

v93 0.005 is goood

possible to push buffer lower?
let's say 64/44100=about 1.5ms

yea i really really liked it too

weight is good
sounds more relaxed fluid than wasapi yet a shade more detailed

adjustable buffer maybe

[Ken Moreland]

V93 0.005 is very good on 16/44 and also on 24/192 too.
KM

[cvrle59]

V93 0.005 is very good on 16/44 and also on 24/192 too.
KM

What player are you using for 24/192?

Edit:
I just noticed that there is 7.41 24/192, I got to give it blast tonight....

[Ken Moreland]

Hi George,
mqnplay24192 7.41avx2 issued on Sept 4 with control 3.64 , it really is very good.

mqnplay2488 7.41avx2 issued on the same day has a line missing so it doesn't work unless you use tasker/loader and mqncontrol 3.65, although it overcame this problem has a different fault giving a loud blast of white noise to test your alertness. One of these issues will be fixed soon I hope and we can dive into 24/88 stuff.

KM

[Aleg]

Hi George,
mqnplay24192 7.41avx2 issued on Sept 4 with control 3.64 , it really is very good.

mqnplay2488 7.41avx2 issued on the same day has a line missing so it doesn't work unless you use tasker/loader and mqncontrol 3.65, although it overcame this problem has a different fault giving a loud blast of white noise to test your alertness. One of these issues will be fixed soon I hope and we can dive into 24/88 stuff.

KM

Hi Ken

You can use mqnplay2488 7.41avx2 with loader and mqncontrol 3.64 just fine.
The mqnloader will circumvent the issue of the missing copy-statement.
So I use MQNLoad with mqnplay2488 7.41avx2 + mqncontrol 3.64 + tasker.bat for the 88.2 kHz and the regular mqn-aff.bat with 3.64 + 7.41 for the rest of the sample rates.

No issues, just have to know I'm dealing with 88.2 before playback

[Ken Moreland]

Thanks for that Aleg, I will do it if it doesn't get fixed. I'd prefer simply using mqn.bat if possible but I'll giveita try next week.
KM

[Aleg]

V94 is a bad one, dropped it from my library after listening to it a few times.

[sima66]

The details are incredible in the v93 0.005. A bit more body wouldn't harm, but even this way so far it's my #1.
Finally with the v93 0.005 I'm starting to enjoy the HiRez again in KS!

[cvrle59]

The details are incredible in the v93 0.005. A bit more body wouldn't harm, but even this way so far it's my #1.
Finally with the v93 0.005 I'm starting to enjoy the HiRez again in KS!

I didn't try v93 0.005, I just tried straight avx2 version, so I liked v91 better. I need to try 0.005, obviously.