MQN

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

uploaded 5.06 sse2 and 5.07 sse2, basically 5.14 with the recent tweaks added.
User avatar
satshanti
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 6:59 pm

Re: MQN

Post by satshanti »

sbgk wrote:6.05 avx2 may be the best version I've heard, layers of detail I'd not heard before etc.
6.05 all can be played by everyone, not quite as good, but interesting none the less.
6.05 sse2 may be better than the avx2
No clipping here, but I seem to have been almost the only one that has 3.39 avx working. Tested various avx2 versions: 5.95, 5.98, 6.02 and 6.05, but they all sound pretty much the same to me, hardly surprising anymore. I guess that my AMD CPU must default to some other setting with these avx2 versions, because after weeks of testing, none of them sound good. I think I now finally decide not to bother with avx2 anymore.

As for the avx and amd versions, I ran a test with the versions available, with the following result:

5.95 amd > 6.05 all > 5.60 (6.00?) amd > 6.05 sse

6.05 all is not bad at all, but with an edge that's a little too sharp. 5.95 on the other hand could do with slightly more focus. Mate these two and its offspring would be perfect! :-)

Noticed Nigel's preferences, so would really love to try out an amd versions of 5.98 and 5.14.

Please allow me to also express my keen interest in an amd hires version of one of these. :-)
uwtfplay on AMD FX8120@1600 RAM@800 FSB@1200 | AQ Jitterbug | Atlas Element USB cable | HiFimeDIY Sabre DAC 2 | NVA Super Sound Pipe | SMSL sApII headphone amp | AKG K702 (or HiFimeDIY UD20 DDX amp | Anti-Cable | Celestion DL6-II)
John Dot
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 6:19 pm

Re: MQN

Post by John Dot »

From 6x I like 6.07 sse2.
JC's manifest file really works, sound is more clean on lower mids and highs are smoother (or cut for someone).

6.07 is one of the best versions.
PC: CPU Q8400, 8GB Ram, Windows 8.1 x64
DAC: HRT Music Streamer II+, Asus Xonar Essence ST (+ HiEnd DYI upgrades)
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

uploaded 6.08 sse2 and avx2, based on 6.07 - embedded JC's manifest, uses different copy command and old assembler

with these versions I'm getting more incidental sounds and easier to follow all the instruments.

what surprised me is that I've found 2 new different ways to copy after all this time.
tony
Posts: 3144
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:36 pm

Re: MQN

Post by tony »

Having a bash at 6.07 and moved straight to 6.08. Like it very much. Very organic sounding no discernible harshness even on my dodgy pc.
Hope you expand out various hires versions as for me anyway this one sounds very special. Bill Evans piano on the Paris Concert first edition twinkles and flows beautifully.
GroupBuySD DAC/First Watt AlephJ/NigeAmp/Audio PC's/Lampi L4.5 Dac/ Groupbuy AD1862 DHT Dac /Quad ESL63's.Tannoy Legacy Cheviots.
Sligolad
Posts: 1089
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 9:52 pm

Re: MQN

Post by Sligolad »

+1 for 6.08.
Just tried 6.08 avx2 after testing lots of different recent versions today as I have been out of action for a while.
Caught my attention straight away compared to all the other recent versions too numerous to mention listened to today.

Running 2.97 Control, Tasker and Mqnload.
Breaking in a new 24 bit DAC so will need some more time with these new MQN versions.
At least I can now finally play with some of the recent HiRez versions finally!!

Nice work on MQN and great to see the great spirit of co-operation which has broken out here recently.
___________________________________________
SD Card DAC, Gryphon Essence Mono's & Pre Amp, Wilson Alexia 2 Speakers,VPI Scout 2 & Supatrac arm, Studer A812 R2R.
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

uploaded 6.09 sse2/avx/avx2 removed a setting which was drowning the sound a bit. Strange how 2 compilers can be so different.

it was another setting, so 6.10 sse2/avx2 has it removed and the old one added back, sounds pretty solid now.

absolutely gorgeous sound, still think when it's right it becomes a physical experience rather than just via the lugholes. really allows the music to sing.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: MQN

Post by jesuscheung »

satshanti wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:anyone tried that manifest i made?
Yes, I just tried it at the end of my tests and in my system it didn't improve the sound. I used 2496 3.39 avx, which is still my absolute favourite (for various reasons 2496 just sounds much better than 1644 in my setup), and your manifest file dampened detail and collapsed sound stage. It might work for others though, just not for me.
interesting...

i thought this tweak would reduce bad things which were already there... guess not
made it worse for you. probably just like timerresolution=0.5ms
John Dot wrote:From 6x I like 6.07 sse2.
JC's manifest file really works, sound is more clean on lower mids and highs are smoother (or cut for someone).
...
quantity increase -> high are smoother. hopefully not smoothed textureless high.
----

try a few more ways, cannot do better... that's end of this manifest tweak
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: MQN

Post by jesuscheung »

prefer 6.08
nige2000
Posts: 4253
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:47 am
Location: meath

Re: MQN

Post by nige2000 »

jesuscheung wrote:
satshanti wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:anyone tried that manifest i made?
Yes, I just tried it at the end of my tests and in my system it didn't improve the sound. I used 2496 3.39 avx, which is still my absolute favourite (for various reasons 2496 just sounds much better than 1644 in my setup), and your manifest file dampened detail and collapsed sound stage. It might work for others though, just not for me.
interesting...

i thought this tweak would reduce bad things which were already there... guess not
made it worse for you. probably just like timerresolution=0.5ms
John Dot wrote:From 6x I like 6.07 sse2.
JC's manifest file really works, sound is more clean on lower mids and highs are smoother (or cut for someone).
...
quantity increase -> high are smoother. hopefully not smoothed textureless high.
----

try a few more ways, cannot do better... that's end of this manifest tweak
i lost texture too, highs smoothed
but seems better when sbgk has it integrated

6.10 sounds ok, needs more detail, better highs
Last edited by nige2000 on Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
Post Reply