MQN

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

what do you mean by clipping ? sounds ok to me.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: MQN

Post by jesuscheung »

sbgk wrote:what do you mean by clipping ? sounds ok to me.
3.39 has no clipping. full weight full depth. most manly sound.

clipping is good. too much is not good.
tony
Posts: 3144
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:36 pm

Re: MQN

Post by tony »

Thankfully I can't play those avx2 versions. Nail clippings and cadburys chocolate what has happened to MQn?
I wonder would they sound steely with Metallica?
GroupBuySD DAC/First Watt AlephJ/NigeAmp/Audio PC's/Lampi L4.5 Dac/ Groupbuy AD1862 DHT Dac /Quad ESL63's.Tannoy Legacy Cheviots.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: MQN

Post by jesuscheung »

6.05 sse is... everything vibrates the same way? sometimes it is extremely impressive... sometimes just feels weird...

the density/vibration is impressive as it is... dense like chocolate here in my setup...
nige2000
Posts: 4253
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:47 am
Location: meath

Re: MQN

Post by nige2000 »

jesuscheung wrote:6.05 sse is... everything vibrates the same way? sometimes it is extremely impressive... sometimes just feels weird...

the density/vibration is impressive as it is... dense like chocolate here in my setup...
Nothing exciting in these last few
bass is weird
Maybe just a bad method to add weight

The sse 2 was as good as any this time

Stick with 5.98 this time
Will check 5.14 again in case I missed something
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
sima66
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:35 pm
Location: Canada

Re: MQN

Post by sima66 »

sbgk wrote:what do you mean by clipping ? sounds ok to me.
Like an old record.
Maybe is "to analog"?! :))))
I5 4440+TXCOmobo+JCAT Femto-Intona-JKRegen+HynesPS+TeraDak ATX-820W=JCATusb=DiverterHR=Wadia 931/922(GNSC mod)=PassLabsXA100.5=2xValhalla=Stacked&moded ESL57+JAS SuperTweet+2MJ Acoustics Ref.I
4SteinHarmonizers;RR777;Tellus;StillpointsUltraSS
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: MQN

Post by jesuscheung »

does 5.14 AVX2 has the treble dynamic like 2.71?
2.71 has gold colour treble tonality. shiny liquid with texture
cvrle59
Posts: 449
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:45 am
Location: Canada

Re: MQN

Post by cvrle59 »

sima66 wrote:
sbgk wrote:what do you mean by clipping ? sounds ok to me.
Like an old record.
Maybe is "to analog"?! :))))
Or too charming, that drives me to sleep in, after long listening...:)
i3 Haswell, PPAStudio USB3 card and USB Micro cable/Chord Hugo/Nad-275BEE/Harbeth-30.1
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: MQN

Post by jesuscheung »

anyone tried that manifest i made?
try it on the classic 2.71 v2, you won't disappointed. all things better... from details to correctness
it was thin sounding. now is rich...
User avatar
satshanti
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 6:59 pm

Re: MQN

Post by satshanti »

jesuscheung wrote:anyone tried that manifest i made?
Yes, I just tried it at the end of my tests and in my system it didn't improve the sound. I used 2496 3.39 avx, which is still my absolute favourite (for various reasons 2496 just sounds much better than 1644 in my setup), and your manifest file dampened detail and collapsed sound stage. It might work for others though, just not for me.
uwtfplay on AMD FX8120@1600 RAM@800 FSB@1200 | AQ Jitterbug | Atlas Element USB cable | HiFimeDIY Sabre DAC 2 | NVA Super Sound Pipe | SMSL sApII headphone amp | AKG K702 (or HiFimeDIY UD20 DDX amp | Anti-Cable | Celestion DL6-II)
Post Reply