lekt player

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

2.96.5 160 good vibrates, only still a bit imbalance vs v2.4.3. need good balance of v2.4.3 for 2.96.5 160.
imbalance is characteristic of my win8pro. now many things installed and uninstalled, and registry now is very bad. OK will re-compile in better environment, think deep night OS better, cleaner.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

2.96.5 plays fast notes notes with ease... make it sounds so so simple....

2.4.3 is godly... i still don't know its true potential!
sometimes 2.4.3 density can reach solid level...
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

ok... nothing is wrong with 2.96.5
all gooood

musical notes feel longer more steady...
wait...
piano note duration... reaches the level of mqn2.82!
not there yet...
notes don't go deeep enough... piano emotion less than 2.82
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

relisten to exenopgomemcpy
bass details is more than i can remember!

too too much sibilance with Aerosmiths... usually i don't care... even too much for me

more sibilance = more bass?!?!?
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

uploaded:
v2.96.5 160 nos1
v2.96.5 160 nos2

i think nos1 soundstage better but vibration less than nos2. prefer nos2, mellow sound.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote:uploaded:
v2.96.5 160 nos1
v2.96.5 160 nos2

i think nos1 soundstage better but vibration less than nos2. prefer nos2, mellow sound.
yes nos2 > nos1. more stable tonality.

both have forward sounding
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

starting to notice one thing,
lekt player is more 'quiet' in the background than other software

maybe notes should fade more slowly in the air...
but note depth is already correct...
i don't know


---------------

piano notes of 2.96.5 is 50% better > mqn2.82
mqn2.82 is 50% better > 2.96.5

2.96.5 nos presents notes slightly differently to 2.96.5...
very difficult to tell which is better
some notes better here.
some notes better there
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

2.96.5 can play notes that go deep.

2.96.5 nos can play legato notes
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

piano
lekt, mqn > xa

xa cannot play any notes properly
weight not very correct
struggles with fast notes
mid is too strong. doesn't sound like a piano.
xa makes piano sounds like playing from 1 hand
piano = 2 hands!

not possible to enjoy piano with xa
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

nos2 sound heigh need reduce a bit, seems little 3D. for piano playing need exactly good sound stage. classical piano sound have many micro nuances, only 100% correct player can reproduce this sound.
JC, do you play buffer size 160 on PCIe card or onboard?
Post Reply