MQN

[sbgk]

No its very good
But 5.00 sounds better to me
It's a bit like 5.06 without the extra sugar

5.06 is the rawest version, 5.00 has the extra sugar as it uses prefetches.

[Aleg]

great,

have uploaded another 3 versions of that one, pick the best and I'll call it a day.

Merge no al nudges ahead of no merge al and both are better than no merge no al

So: merge no al > no merge al >> no merge no al

thanks

5.06 original was merge al, how does that compare with merge no al ?

just been listening to merge no al for the last 30 mins and sounds good.

Merge no al is better than merge al.
More clarity and more live sound.

[sbgk]

Merge no al nudges ahead of no merge al and both are better than no merge no al

So: merge no al > no merge al >> no merge no al

thanks

5.06 original was merge al, how does that compare with merge no al ?

just been listening to merge no al for the last 30 mins and sounds good.

Merge no al is better than merge al.
More clarity and more live sound.

great, thanks to that last minute interjection by JC I think we have a winner. Shall get the rest out over the next week.

thanks to you all for being part of this insane journey.

I cleared out a directory last week and it had 1388 versions of mqnplay.exe.

[sbgk]

just one more - uploaded 5.06 avx norm, based on merge no al, just has one instruction different,

just wondered is it any better than merge no al ?

cheers

[Aleg]

just one more - uploaded 5.06 avx norm, based on merge no al, just has one instruction different,

just wondered is it any better than merge no al ?

cheers

No its definitely not better, it lost much of its clarity, becoming more flat sounding.
Please, stick to merge no al.

[nige2000]

No its very good
But 5.00 sounds better to me
It's a bit like 5.06 without the extra sugar

Try 5.06 merge no al and say again what you think !!

Cheers

Thought my phone language was set to French there
I've left the house so ill just have to trust you
I Doubt I'll disagree
Was some bad ones between 5.00 and 5.06 128

Clock rates need further reduction too
Maybe release the clockrate fixation

Excellent work

Oh I see
One for the road eh!!!!

[sbgk]

just one more - uploaded 5.06 avx norm, based on merge no al, just has one instruction different,

just wondered is it any better than merge no al ?

cheers

No its definitely not better, it lost much of its clarity, becoming more flat sounding.
Please, stick to merge no al.

ok, thanks

[sbgk]

uploaded 5.06 merge no al as version 5.07

uploaded sse2, avx and avx2

avx is for avx instruction set with 128 bit bus and avx2 is for 256 bit bus ie haswell and up ( previously had been calling avx2 avx, which wasn't accurate)

[nige2000]

uploaded 5.06 merge no al as version 5.07

uploaded sse2, avx and avx2

avx is for avx instruction set with 128 bit bus and avx2 is for 256 bit bus ie haswell and up ( previously had been calling avx2 avx, which wasn't accurate)

what were we playing with today avx or avx2?
whens the avx 512 coming out?

[sbgk]

uploaded 5.06 merge no al as version 5.07

uploaded sse2, avx and avx2

avx is for avx instruction set with 128 bit bus and avx2 is for 256 bit bus ie haswell and up ( previously had been calling avx2 avx, which wasn't accurate)

what were we playing with today avx or avx2?
whens the avx 512 coming out?

avx2

skylake 2015

uploaded 3 more versions of 5.07, just to be sure, they sound different, don't know if better.

uploaded sse2 hw xor 256 version

the hw xor 256 versions are pretty good, quite an intoxicating sound