Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
-
Aleg
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:26 pm
Post
by Aleg »
sbgk wrote:jesuscheung wrote:nop... 5.05 not better. treble lacks warmth
for me, 4.74 is best. all things ok.
combine of hires + musicality
need to more micro-refinement
uploaded 5.06 avx/sse2 = 4.74 with new compiler plus alignment, any better ?
I'm really sorry, but this is really, really awful.
Bland, textureless, no highs, full textureless lows.
This one goes straight to the bin.
Again, sorry
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
-
sbgk
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm
Post
by sbgk »
Aleg wrote:sbgk wrote:jesuscheung wrote:nop... 5.05 not better. treble lacks warmth
for me, 4.74 is best. all things ok.
combine of hires + musicality
need to more micro-refinement
uploaded 5.06 avx/sse2 = 4.74 with new compiler plus alignment, any better ?
I'm really sorry, but this is really, really awful.
Bland, textureless, no highs, full textureless lows.
This one goes straight to the bin.
Again, sorry
and the 128 version ?
-
Aleg
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:26 pm
Post
by Aleg »
sbgk wrote:Aleg wrote:sbgk wrote:
uploaded 5.06 avx/sse2 = 4.74 with new compiler plus alignment, any better ?
I'm really sorry, but this is really, really awful.
Bland, textureless, no highs, full textureless lows.
This one goes straight to the bin.
Again, sorry
and the 128 version ?
That's much better again.
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
-
sbgk
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm
Post
by sbgk »
great,
have uploaded another 3 versions of that one, pick the best and I'll call it a day.
-
nige2000
- Posts: 4253
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:47 am
- Location: meath
Post
by nige2000 »
What about 5.00 in a 128 version?
Or is there a fault in 5.00 I missed
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
-
sbgk
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm
Post
by sbgk »
nige2000 wrote:What about 5.00 in a 128 version?
Or is there a fault in 5.00 I missed
you don't like 5.06 128 ?
5.00 uses 128 already
-
nige2000
- Posts: 4253
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:47 am
- Location: meath
Post
by nige2000 »
No its very good
But 5.00 sounds better to me
It's a bit like 5.06 without the extra sugar
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
-
Aleg
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:26 pm
Post
by Aleg »
sbgk wrote:great,
have uploaded another 3 versions of that one, pick the best and I'll call it a day.
Merge no al nudges ahead of no merge al and both are better than no merge no al
So: merge no al > no merge al >> no merge no al
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
-
Aleg
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:26 pm
Post
by Aleg »
nige2000 wrote:No its very good
But 5.00 sounds better to me
It's a bit like 5.06 without the extra sugar
Try 5.06 merge no al and say again what you think !!
Cheers
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
-
sbgk
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm
Post
by sbgk »
Aleg wrote:sbgk wrote:great,
have uploaded another 3 versions of that one, pick the best and I'll call it a day.
Merge no al nudges ahead of no merge al and both are better than no merge no al
So: merge no al > no merge al >> no merge no al
thanks
5.06 original was merge al, how does that compare with merge no al ?
just been listening to merge no al for the last 30 mins and sounds good.
Last edited by
sbgk on Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.