Truth or Beauty?

So if you HAD to choose...

Truth
7
37%
Beauty
12
63%
 
Total votes: 19

User avatar
Ivor
Posts: 4224
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:21 pm

Re: Truth or Beauty?

Post by Ivor »

tony wrote:
Diapason wrote:I'm finding this all very interesting. Poll added.
Can you vote twice?

you're not voting for Sinn Fein now Tony!
Vinyl -anything else is data storage.

Thorens TD124 Mk1 + Kuzma Stogi 12"arm, HANA Red, Gold Note PH 10 + PSU. ADI-2 Dac, Lector CDP7, Wyred4Sound pre, Airtight ATM1s, Klipsch Heresy IV, Misc Mains, RCA + XLR ICs, Tellurium Q spkr cable
tony
Posts: 3144
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:36 pm

Re: Truth or Beauty?

Post by tony »

Ivor wrote:
tony wrote:
Diapason wrote:I'm finding this all very interesting. Poll added.
Can you vote twice?

you're not voting for Sinn Fein now Tony!

Hehe doesn't look as if I need to with that lot. They seem to be doing just dandy regardless
GroupBuySD DAC/First Watt AlephJ/NigeAmp/Audio PC's/Lampi L4.5 Dac/ Groupbuy AD1862 DHT Dac /Quad ESL63's.Tannoy Legacy Cheviots.
Adrian
Posts: 830
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:47 am

Re: Truth or Beauty?

Post by Adrian »

Well judging by the photos on the previous page... I'm going for Beauty....

As long as the music is enjoyable, reasonably accurate and does not give me a pain in my head... beauty will do just fine.
Let the Good Times Roll...................
tweber
Posts: 928
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:34 pm

Re: Truth or Beauty?

Post by tweber »

As long as the music is enjoyable, reasonably accurate and does not give me a pain in my head... beauty will do just fine.
The Beautiful Truth?
User avatar
cybot
Posts: 6984
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 3:20 pm

Re: Truth or Beauty?

Post by cybot »

tweber wrote:
As long as the music is enjoyable, reasonably accurate and does not give me a pain in my head... beauty will do just fine.
The Beautiful Truth?
Nice one Shane :)
mcq
Posts: 1086
Joined: Sun May 09, 2010 2:30 am

Re: Truth or Beauty?

Post by mcq »

As Dave pointed out earlier, what we hear is simply a reflection of how the engineer set up the recording.  Where he placed the microphones and how he balanced the levels.  After that, we tune our own systems to reproduce the music to fit our respective tastes.  I favour a somewhat warm, somewhat forgiving environment that can make bright recordings more listenable over a longer period of time.  And yet, it's important to strike a balance here.  I want clarity and detail as well.  I want to hear the energy and fire that the performers invested in the music.  And I also want hear air around the performers' voices and instruments.  I want a sense of the live environment and hear how the musicians are interacting with each other.  What I don't want is a clinical approximation of the real thing.  If there is dirt and grime in there, I want to hear that as well.

One could argue that there is more truth in beauty than there is beauty in truth.  Alternatively, the necessity of truth outweighs the desire for beauty.  Keats argued for a more equitable balance between the two but identifed the primacy of the intellect to discern beauty in the truths that endure and give shape and meaning to our lives, whilst accepting the inherently transitory nature of ephemeral truth.
Gryphon Diablo 300, dCS Rossini (with matching clock), Kharma Exquisite Mini, Ansuz C2, Finite Elemente Master Reference.
item_audio
Posts: 29
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:56 am

Re: Truth or Beauty?

Post by item_audio »

People who pride themselves on their bold, unvarnished honesty - 'calling a spade a spade', 'telling it how it is' - are usually inconsiderate and egotistical. In life, you have to temper truth with tact.

Similarly, 100%, literal candour isn't necessarily truthful on the larger scale or a deeper level. You may momentarily be infuriated by your wife or children, but screaming hatefully at them - truly expressing those impulses - isn't truly how you feel.

Similarly, myths often tell truths, despite not being true.

Similarly, some audio equipment, artfully voiced, aims primarily to communicate musical gestalt ahead of 100% truthfulness to the recording. Some aims only for the latter. Both are hard to make. Only the latter is suitable in a studio, but in your listening room/head, there's no right or wrong. You may favour 'truth' when younger; 'beauty' when older. Or vice versa. Your current preference will probably change.

Truth is beauty; beauty isn't always truth. But music must foremost be beautiful, else what is it for?
User avatar
Diapason
Posts: 4123
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:51 am

Re: Truth or Beauty?

Post by Diapason »

Good stuff. After a shaky start, Beauty is winning now...
Nerdcave: ...is no more! :(
Sitting Room: Wadia 581SE - Rega Planar 3/AT VM95ML & SH - Bluesound Node II - Copland CSA 100 - Audioplan Kontrast 3
Kitchen: WiiM Pro - Wadia 151 - B&W 685s2
Aleg
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:26 pm

Re: Truth or Beauty?

Post by Aleg »

item_audio wrote:...
Truth is beauty; beauty isn't always truth. But music must foremost be beautiful, else what is it for?
For some there is beauty in truth. Nobody listens to uglyness as the intention of listening to music.

But the truth of a recording is made in the engineer's studio and doesn't need to be remastered at home into something else.

And if you want to change something, do it somewhere else in the signal chain of your setup and not in the software player used by all as the source component, because what is lost can never be regained.

So neutral tonal balance and with as much details as are present in the recording is what should be the aim of an audiophile software player.

If it shows flaws in your setup's hardware/software/hifi-components, so be it and you have to address those issues and not dumb down the input quality so the flaws in your system don't show.

Cheers
Aleg
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
nige2000
Posts: 4253
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:47 am
Location: meath

Re: Truth or Beauty?

Post by nige2000 »

Aleg wrote:
item_audio wrote:...
Truth is beauty; beauty isn't always truth. But music must foremost be beautiful, else what is it for?
For some there is beauty in truth. Nobody listens to uglyness as the intention of listening to music.

But the truth of a recording is made in the engineer's studio and doesn't need to be remastered at home into something else.

And if you want to change something, do it somewhere else in the signal chain of your setup and not in the software player used by all as the source component, because what is lost can never be regained.

So neutral tonal balance and with as much details as are present in the recording is what should be the aim of an audiophile software player.

If it shows flaws in your setup hardware/software/components, so be it and you have to address those issues and not dumb down the input quality so the flaws in your system don't show.

Cheers
Aleg
agreed

truth beauty thing is very much open to interpretation (what is truth what is beauty)
would be easier to do with system demonstrations
think we might steal some of them beauty votes
detail is best when it is also beautiful
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
Post Reply