MQN

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

uploaded 2.49 which is just 2.48, but with all the sample rates coded. I don't plan on any further updates for SQ.
sima66
Posts: 872
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:35 pm
Location: Canada

Re: MQN

Post by sima66 »

sbgk wrote:
sima66 wrote: You sure that you downloaded the right one?! :))))))
Deer boy, (get it, your breaking hart comment a few posts back, anyway) I do this so I don't need to download.
Of course that I know that you don't need to download! ;)
I was just expressing my disbelief (in my way), since a lot of people likes it and agree on this one, but I find hard to believe that you don't!
Stop picking "under the bonnet"! ;-)
I5 4440+TXCOmobo+JCAT Femto-Intona-JKRegen+HynesPS+TeraDak ATX-820W=JCATusb=DiverterHR=Wadia 931/922(GNSC mod)=PassLabsXA100.5=2xValhalla=Stacked&moded ESL57+JAS SuperTweet+2MJ Acoustics Ref.I
4SteinHarmonizers;RR777;Tellus;StillpointsUltraSS
User avatar
satshanti
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 6:59 pm

Re: MQN

Post by satshanti »

I can only repeat what some of the others have already experienced and shared on the last few pages:

avx is still better than any sse on both of my systems (different DAC's, one 16/44, one 24/96). Tested the new sse's just for the heck of it, and unfortunately must confirm that for me this is not the right direction. 2.41 and 2.47 are moving even further away from 2.39 and 2.40 and sound really bad. The best of the sse's is still 2.31. Control 1.3 is better than 1.1, but control 100000 beats them both.

And after all the sse testing I did, I happily went back to avx 2.20 / ctrl 100000. But then I tried avx 100000 again in stead of 2.20, and contrary to what I wrote in my last post, I just like it better. No matter the slight loss in detail, it is so natural, so spacious, so musical, so... right. I just love it! :-)

So also for me the golden oldie best combo is still ctrl/play avx 100000.
uwtfplay on AMD FX8120@1600 RAM@800 FSB@1200 | AQ Jitterbug | Atlas Element USB cable | HiFimeDIY Sabre DAC 2 | NVA Super Sound Pipe | SMSL sApII headphone amp | AKG K702 (or HiFimeDIY UD20 DDX amp | Anti-Cable | Celestion DL6-II)
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

it's caused by the limitations of passing data through the cpu, the 100000 used hardware prefetch which has that digital sound, the idea is to have the data in the L1 cache just before it's required, that's what 2.49 does, any perceived lack of dynamics is due to lack of noise.

If you like 2.31 you should like 2.49

use control 1.4 as there is a fix to allow 24/192 to play
darkpink
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 11:18 pm

Re: MQN

Post by darkpink »

avx 100000 sounds a tad more digital and flatter than the other new ones on my setup, so I agree with Gordons previous statement. I agree it has more speed, but details? No. Nothing that I feel is lacking in the other ones. But i feel that the avx is lacking in athmosphere/presence/3d. Interesting that so many think its the best
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

satshanti wrote:I can only repeat what some of the others have already experienced and shared on the last few pages:

avx is still better than any sse on both of my systems (different DAC's, one 16/44, one 24/96). Tested the new sse's just for the heck of it, and unfortunately must confirm that for me this is not the right direction. 2.41 and 2.47 are moving even further away from 2.39 and 2.40 and sound really bad. The best of the sse's is still 2.31. Control 1.3 is better than 1.1, but control 100000 beats them both.

And after all the sse testing I did, I happily went back to avx 2.20 / ctrl 100000. But then I tried avx 100000 again in stead of 2.20, and contrary to what I wrote in my last post, I just like it better. No matter the slight loss in detail, it is so natural, so spacious, so musical, so... right. I just love it! :-)

So also for me the golden oldie best combo is still ctrl/play avx 100000.
avx vs sse is not open to debate, what we are trying to do is find the best code path.

you still have 2.49 to test. That's me done, I'll retry these old versions, but think 2.49 is the best I can get.
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

darkpink wrote:avx 100000 sounds a tad more digital and flatter than the other new ones on my setup, so I agree with Gordons previous statement. I agree it has more speed, but details? No. Nothing that I feel is lacking in the other ones. But i feel that the avx is lacking in athmosphere/presence/3d. Interesting that so many think its the best
avx on a haswell is something else, just I can't play it so reluctant to release another version without understanding why, it might damage the machine.
nige2000
Posts: 4253
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:47 am
Location: meath

Re: MQN

Post by nige2000 »

i actually thought the noise floor got a little worse somewhere around 2.37 think i mentioned it at the time

there are a few versions that have some real nice properties, theres not one that has them all yet

i have a few new ones to test yet
avx always gave an advantage here
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
User avatar
Ken Moreland
Posts: 814
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 7:47 pm

Re: MQN

Post by Ken Moreland »

Just listened to a few albums on R2.49+R1.4

Van Morrison - Astral Weeks 24/192
Rickie Lee Jones - Pirates 24/88
Oliver Nelson - Blues and the Abstract Truth 16/44

Very impressed on all sample rates, low noise floor, plenty of detail, good bass. Highly recommended.
i5 QuietPC , JplayFemto , Singxer SU-6 , Holo Audio Spring DAC ,LAB12 Preamp, Roundtree Mono Amps, Rosso Fiorentino Elba 2 Speakers
.
Aleg
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:26 pm

Re: MQN

Post by Aleg »

Ken Moreland wrote:Just listened to a few albums on R2.49+R1.4

Van Morrison - Astral Weeks 24/192
Rickie Lee Jones - Pirates 24/88
Oliver Nelson - Blues and the Abstract Truth 16/44

Very impressed on all sample rates, low noise floor, plenty of detail, good bass. Highly recommended.
Ken

Is this in 24-bit container or in 32-bit container?

Cheers

Aleg
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
Post Reply