MQN

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
taggart
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 10:44 pm
Location: Cologne

Re: MQN

Post by taggart »

John Dot wrote:Try to use different mqncontrol.exe 2.71 448 10.7144810 it helped me.
Thanks, I missed that. Helped partly. Both playing now, but rel version only with distortions.
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

see jplay 5.2 now has a method where mqn could be the player interfacing to jplay using asio cable software, don't know what that does to minimise noise.
mjock3
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 5:36 am

Re: MQN

Post by mjock3 »

mjock3 wrote:Still won't play.

Went to the R1 looked in task manager and it shows both mqncontrol &mqnplay in background processes. The taskmanager in R2 only shows the mqncontrol in the background processes.

Does anyone have any ideas on this?

Thank you,

Mark
Anyone able to help me with this issue?? Please..
John Dot
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 6:19 pm

Re: MQN

Post by John Dot »

mjock3 wrote:
mjock3 wrote: Anyone able to help me with this issue?? Please..
What do you have installed on your system? [that's critical]
PC: CPU Q8400, 8GB Ram, Windows 8.1 x64
DAC: HRT Music Streamer II+, Asus Xonar Essence ST (+ HiEnd DYI upgrades)
mjock3
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 5:36 am

Re: MQN

Post by mjock3 »

I have R2, jriver, jplay, mqn, totalcmd, and drivers. That's it.

Thanks
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

mjock3 wrote:I have R2, jriver, jplay, mqn, totalcmd, and drivers. That's it.

Thanks
jrmc wasapi work ?
Aleg
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:26 pm

Re: MQN

Post by Aleg »

mjock3 wrote:
mjock3 wrote:Still won't play.

Went to the R1 looked in task manager and it shows both mqncontrol &mqnplay in background processes. The taskmanager in R2 only shows the mqncontrol in the background processes.

Does anyone have any ideas on this?

Thank you,

Mark
Anyone able to help me with this issue?? Please..

Mark

Did you read this reply to your question by Nigel?
nige2000 wrote:No wasapi in core mode
minimal server mode is ok
Cheers

Aleg
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

uploaded a 448 10ms version that uses the assembly code

2.72 448 movdqa rel raw background and a non rel one.

Sounds pretty good, good to get the benefit of all the testing that went on with the assembly code.

makes the previous version sound clunky, don't know why I thought it was thin sounding, does my hearing change that much day to day.
tony
Posts: 3144
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:36 pm

Re: MQN

Post by tony »

Thank god you moved up to 2.72. Was getting lost with all the 2.71's. Whats with the new long winded naming convention? I hope the long file name doesn't affect the output!
GroupBuySD DAC/First Watt AlephJ/NigeAmp/Audio PC's/Lampi L4.5 Dac/ Groupbuy AD1862 DHT Dac /Quad ESL63's.Tannoy Legacy Cheviots.
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

tony wrote:Thank god you moved up to 2.72. Was getting lost with all the 2.71's. Whats with the new long winded naming convention? I hope the long file name doesn't affect the output!
the file is renamed to the uploaded filename under controlled conditions to ensure nothing can compromise the sound, as long as there is no extraneous electrical load on the pc when you rename it back then the electrical characteristics of the file should remain as per design. Maybe I should put them in version specific folders so that they are pre-renamed.
Post Reply