lekt player

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

2.40.1 is best of all versions! we can take vocation. enjoy the work done!
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

jesuscheung wrote:2.40.1 is best of all versions! we can take vocation. enjoy the work done!
have very interesting version, vibration a bit lesser, but all other things seem better, especially soundstage, width very nice (sound mellow and clarity at left/right edges, nice!). clarity. feel more emotion?

uploaded v2.40.2 256 , i take this soundstage for template of lekt player, best oval. try it.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote: have very interesting version, vibration a bit lesser, but all other things seem better, especially soundstage, width very nice (sound mellow and clarity at left/right edges, nice!). clarity. feel more emotion?

uploaded v2.40.2 256 , i take this soundstage for template of lekt player, best oval. try it.
-yes 2.40.2 has better distance. 2.40.1 close to ear.
-2.40.1 sounds quit correct in soundstage. 2.40.2 sounds better.
-not sure more emotion. already 100% emotion haha. think emotion more natural. need more listening.

excellent. thx
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

i think 2.40.2 can be little closer to ear. just a little. or maybe i mean a little bigger stage.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

2.40.1 has a big stage. maybe coz closer to ear.
a stage size like 2.40.1 will be nice. 2.40.2 seems more correct in positioning. not sure. both very very very good.

even japanese pop sounds correct in soundstage. soundstage better than old versions already.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

changed my mind. think 2.40.1 is better in soundstage. non-tiring simple soundstage. more focus on music. can listen for a long time.
2.40.2 seems more pretty- more effects.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

jesuscheung wrote:2.40.1 has a big stage. maybe coz closer to ear.
a stage size like 2.40.1 will be nice. 2.40.2 seems more correct in positioning. not sure. both very very very good.

even japanese pop sounds correct in soundstage. soundstage better than old versions already.
right, 2.40.1 better (take 2.40.2 for refference left/right edges sound). have builded better versions, testing now, will upload later. this method of 2.40x very good, can make variations and micro changes but all of them have good soundstage.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt, remember you told me about mqn.exe 1.2? and remember mqn 2.51 rax no zi is the brother of 1.2? back then, my OS is very unoptimized. rax no zi sounds better. now my OS is super optimized i say my OS is 300% better, 1.2 also improves 300% but rax no zi only improves like 50%.

have you even considered what kind of coding has biggest potential improvement due to tweaking??

i shall listen to old lekt players and see what happens haha. my days of OS tweaking is about to finish.
lekt
Posts: 1102
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 4:52 am

Re: lekt player

Post by lekt »

jesuscheung wrote:...have you even considered what kind of coding has biggest potential improvement due to tweaking??
bad code, haha...

uploaded 2.40.3 256 , a bit improved vibration, bass and vocal changed, orientation to 2.39.1's emotion. try it.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: lekt player

Post by jesuscheung »

lekt wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:...have you even considered what kind of coding has biggest potential improvement due to tweaking??
bad code, haha...

uploaded 2.40.3 256 , a bit improved vibration, bass and vocal changed, orientation to 2.39.1's emotion. try it.
.......

2.40.3 256
-new style. more substance.
-but also heavier sound. slightly bloated -> less transparent during high volume high vibration high density.
-less musical nuance. so, less emotion. less engaging.
-stage size kept. weight kept. flow kept.

more substance is good! think more difficult to keep airy. (like MQn versions with 'raw', it is rich, but lacks fine-grained/transparent/musical nuance)

shall mod this version.
Post Reply