MQN
Re: MQN
After a whole day of listening :-), (well mostly working), I find I prefer 2.65 SSE4 to 2.65 SSE4 v3
The sound of v3 becomes a bit more closed in and looses some of it clarity.
I will try SSE2 version next and see what it brings for me.
Cheers
Aleg
The sound of v3 becomes a bit more closed in and looses some of it clarity.
I will try SSE2 version next and see what it brings for me.
Cheers
Aleg
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
Re: MQN
probably a good sign that no ones jumping in saying other versions are better
need to try it with a variety of tracks to be conclusive
very interesting versions though
need to try it with a variety of tracks to be conclusive
very interesting versions though
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
Re: MQN
Tried the 2.65 SSE2 on my machine, but really in the very first notes it is obvious that in my setup it does not have the detail and overtones of the 2.65 SSE4.
So 2.65 SSE4 will remain my favourite for the moment.
Cheers
Aleg
So 2.65 SSE4 will remain my favourite for the moment.
Cheers
Aleg
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2013 2:07 pm
- Location: Near Paris, France
Re: MQN
Is there, yet, a 24 bit version that will play 16/44 ?
I'm aksing coz' my V-Link-II appears to want 24 bit packets to work with, and when I first tried 2.59 it didna work.
I'm aksing coz' my V-Link-II appears to want 24 bit packets to work with, and when I first tried 2.59 it didna work.
Cubox-i2/Volumio/Meridan G68ADV/2 x Amptastic mini-1/Custom Hifi Cables DC3 psu/Audium Comp 5
Re: MQN
I've just played 2.65 sse4 V3. The detail is mega, it is crystal clear. When I hear details that were deep in the background they are now almost at the same level as the main instruments. I don't know whether this is simply a side effect of the extreme clarity and so it's correct or have the details been boosted in some way.
I think unless the recording is very good the sound of some recordings (non-acoustic) will become tiring.
I think unless the recording is very good the sound of some recordings (non-acoustic) will become tiring.
Re: MQN
HiLowOrbit wrote:I've only had a listen to 2.65 SSE4 V3, not had a chance to listen to the SSE2 version. Have to say it's as reported - very good indeed.
Will try the SSE2 version, for the sake of completeness.
Meanwhile - A 24bit version of the above would be welcome :-)
Mark
Yes, would love a 24 bit version to and am very happy to do lots of testing and help with SQ findings / results etc
Regards
Clive
-
- Posts: 2491
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm
Re: MQN
agree. in fact, all 2.6x needs a fix on stage. in general, i feel stage is smaller than norm. and some versions are closed in/too near ears.Aleg wrote:After a whole day of listening :-), (well mostly working), I find I prefer 2.65 SSE4 to 2.65 SSE4 v3
The sound of v3 becomes a bit more closed in and looses some of it clarity.
I will try SSE2 version next and see what it brings for me.
Cheers
Aleg
Re: MQN
I know, I am way behind in reading this thread. Any idea what parameters were adjusted in the bios??mick wrote:To reinforce what sbgk has said, while in Nige's house the other night,Nige was working with the equipment, he put on a track and there was an obvious improvement in sq. I thought he had changed the dac however he had actually adjusted parameters in the bios. That was the level of improvement.
Thanks,
Mark
Re: MQN
Theres a few things to change.mjock3 wrote:I know, I am way behind in reading this thread. Any idea what parameters were adjusted in the bios??mick wrote:To reinforce what sbgk has said, while in Nige's house the other night,Nige was working with the equipment, he put on a track and there was an obvious improvement in sq. I thought he had changed the dac however he had actually adjusted parameters in the bios. That was the level of improvement.
Thanks,
Mark
whats the mobo and cpu
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's