Potentiometer choices.
Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2015 1:56 pm
I have to replace the pot on my passive amplifier as I recycled it from old equipment and despite cleaning, it is scratchy. Does anyone have thoughts or advice on the following options?
1. Buy a good quality replacement from Radionics e.g. http://ie.rs-online.com/web/p/potentiometers/2369604/
2. Make a stepped attenuator soldering resistors on to an attenuator switch such as http://www.hificollective.co.uk/switche ... lated.html . What is the sonic advantage? I'm not sure I buy the idea that different resistors have different sonic charms and this approach is somehow better than the slider in the ALPS pot above. (It's doubtless more satisfying for the hobbyist in me to work out the correct resistor values and solder it up - but will it be better?)
3. One problem with either the above is that there is no remote control. If going down the discrete resistor path, I'm tempted by the idea of interfacing an arduino with some relays that switch appropriate resistors in and out.
4. But rather than relays, what about this beastie at radionics: http://ie.rs-online.com/web/p/digital-p ... s/5405270/ , a digital pot where the 'relay switching' is presumably done by semiconductors on the chip. My question here is to the quality of this approach and whether it presents a genuine resistance on the output pins without associated noise from the switching electronics. Spec claim low distortion, so is this the holy grail of a cheap pot that I can quite easily make into a remote using an arduino?
Any thoughts or experiences of this are most welcome.
1. Buy a good quality replacement from Radionics e.g. http://ie.rs-online.com/web/p/potentiometers/2369604/
2. Make a stepped attenuator soldering resistors on to an attenuator switch such as http://www.hificollective.co.uk/switche ... lated.html . What is the sonic advantage? I'm not sure I buy the idea that different resistors have different sonic charms and this approach is somehow better than the slider in the ALPS pot above. (It's doubtless more satisfying for the hobbyist in me to work out the correct resistor values and solder it up - but will it be better?)
3. One problem with either the above is that there is no remote control. If going down the discrete resistor path, I'm tempted by the idea of interfacing an arduino with some relays that switch appropriate resistors in and out.
4. But rather than relays, what about this beastie at radionics: http://ie.rs-online.com/web/p/digital-p ... s/5405270/ , a digital pot where the 'relay switching' is presumably done by semiconductors on the chip. My question here is to the quality of this approach and whether it presents a genuine resistance on the output pins without associated noise from the switching electronics. Spec claim low distortion, so is this the holy grail of a cheap pot that I can quite easily make into a remote using an arduino?
Any thoughts or experiences of this are most welcome.