Page 95 of 299

Re: lekt player

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 3:25 am
by jesuscheung
lekt wrote:v2.72 sound rises up not much as needed, like as height not enough, but i think height enough. interesting, its vibration very nice.

uploaded lekt.exe1644 v2.72.1 256 (core file, use with old lektshell.exe v2.72), only micro change, sound now rises up, i feel more air, more live. but other things? try it.
yes, 2.72.1 is correct in 'rise up'.
not the same as 2.72. less positive tune. less sweet. less emotion. less 'special' resolution.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 11:55 am
by lekt
i see v2.72.1 have good bass, weight and depth most correct. have little intense but sound texture OK, need take care about this version, sound seems good, JC.

uploaded:
lekt.exe1644 v2.74 256
lektshell.exe1644 v2.74 256 s1
lektshell.exe1644 v2.74 256 s2

SQ very good, i think best of lekt, soundstage have new style, s1 bass have focus, not like as other version. but correct or not?
try them and endjoy!

Re: lekt player

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 3:36 pm
by jesuscheung
lekt wrote:i see v2.72.1 have good bass, weight and depth most correct. have little intense but sound texture OK, need take care about this version, sound seems good, JC.

uploaded:
lekt.exe1644 v2.74 256
lektshell.exe1644 v2.74 256 s1
lektshell.exe1644 v2.74 256 s2

SQ very good, i think best of lekt, soundstage have new style, s1 bass have focus, not like as other version. but correct or not?
try them and endjoy!
2.74 s1 vs 2.72
2.74 more mellow. 2.74 is natural with soundstage. 2.74 has real+rich+airy+sweet treble.
"s1 bass have focus". i guess i understand what you mean!
think 2.72 has more micro-resolution/vibration.

now listening to 2.74 s2....

think 2.74 s2 is upgrade of 2.72.
2.74 s1 has better tune than 2.74 s2.
2.74 s2 is like 2.72, has more micro-resolution.
2.74 s1 makes music flows like silk. 2.72/2.74s2 is a little dirty

2.74 s1 has least jitters and is the most correct version. tune, vibration, bass, soundstage everything is >99% well-done. best balance.

2.74 s1 is like 2.4.3.
2.74 s1 needs more energy to completely beat 2.4.3.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2014 3:57 pm
by jesuscheung
still prefer 2.72
2.72's tune > 2.74 s2
2.72's energy > 2.74 s1

Re: lekt player

Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:57 am
by lekt
testing is very important, JC. windows not stable, sometime fooled me, give excellent sound, but after 30min maybe very bad. each time when running compiler sound changes. always need compare with other version.
v2.72 tune is best, not intense. v2.73 s1 have little little intense. what is this intense? when sound vibrates not correct we hear something compressed, shadow, ...

Re: lekt player

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 2:07 am
by lekt
uploaded:
lekt.exe1644 v2.75 256
lektshell.exe1644 v2.75 256

improved vibration, bass weight and depth now is good. try it.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 4:54 am
by jesuscheung
2.74 s1 vs 2.75
-2.74 s1 has more true richness in treble. 2.75 is rich but lost air. not truly rich.
-2.75 like 2.74 s1 has very very very small intense. 0.01% intense. lol
-2.75 sound depth seems correct? vocal ends longer.
-2.75 bass seems better.
-everything else 2.75=2.74 s1

Re: lekt player

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 2:54 pm
by lekt
v2.75 vocal and instruments focus not good, JC. vocal focus need exactly in one point as v2.70 s1. when one factor improved, other has become false. how difficult reproduce sound totally correct. but i believe >99% we can make it in future.

uploaded:
lekt.exe1644 v2.75.1 256
lektshell.exe1644 v2.75.1 256

hard to beat v2.72 in tune, intenseless. but this new version have nice bass, bass also can make wind sound in good tweaked OS. try it.

Re: lekt player

Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 3:19 pm
by lekt
sorry, i confused with shell file version.

re-uploaded lektshell.exe1644 v2.75.1 256

Re: lekt player

Posted: Tue Feb 18, 2014 4:10 am
by jesuscheung
lekt wrote:v2.75 vocal and instruments focus not good, JC. vocal focus need exactly in one point as v2.70 s1. when one factor improved, other has become false. how difficult reproduce sound totally correct.....
yes... i see you have superb understand of bass. no problem making correct bass.

2.75.1 is great. try make it intenseless -> tune will be automatically correct and sweet. i think tune also affects texture. i see old versions with good tune also have good texture.

actually i just realize old versions with positive+sweet tune have better energy. there is a pattern!

soundstage is natural. good width/depth/height. sound is very rich. air is actually really good. but transparent not keeping up