First, some background...
Early this summer, I took the mods on my DAM1021 Rev1's almost as far as one could go without going to LiFePO4 or Ultracap power, as documented here and in a few following posts:
https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/digital ... 83813.html
Also around the same time (give or take a couple of months), I got some recent ESS-DAC-chip based setups running... a couple of Twisted Pear Audio Buffalo-IIIPro setups (one the ES9028 version with a Legato I/V stage, the other the ES9038 version with their Mercury I/V stage), Ian Canada's prototype ES9028Q2M RPi DAC with Onetics output tranformers, and the Allo.com Katana. As I summarized in this post:
https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/vendor- ... 60908.html
"At their best, they beat my modified Soekris in detailing and start to get near it in naturalness, thought the Soekris still has that 'R2R' sound that is closer to good vinyl than most digital reproduction."
So I'm looking at ways to increase the resolution of my Soerkis.
Some thoughts...
First there is the LiFePO4 / Ultracap supply direction. I DO intend to go there after Ian has his offerings available. So that's a direction I will be going, just not right now. As I suggested in this thread of Ian's:
https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/pc-base ... 26395.html
... his simple but well-designed RPi DAC with Onetics transformers on the outputs on an RPi->Allo Isolator->Allo Kali reclocker stack (with each of the other boards in the stack powered by Uptone Audio LPS-1.2s... 2 in parallel for the RPi) is in many ways the best digital setup I have running. AND this is without running it on a linear-modified RPi. In this case, I'm running it with an attached charging source similar to the LiFePO4 float charging using an LPS-1 (sounded better than a LPS-1.2). I did hear a tiny bit if SQ drop with the charger connected, but not enough to lose the always-on no-hassle convenience. Ian did hear a sufficiently significant SQ drop in his experiments with this to not pursue it. I SUSPECT my use of an off-the-grid charging supply reduces that SQ drop, I still need to confirm that and see if I can get Ian to try it too.
I'm planning to wait for his boards so I can develop a 'systems' approach I can use with the other various DACs I have running here, just as I currently use 2 sets of multi-rail backplane supply to power those DACs.
I know this is a necessary step to the best available sound. Soon.
Then on the current mod-set, there are some additional steps worth trying. AnalogSA mentioned in this post it being easy to use a separate regulator to power the DAM's clock separately from the FPGA and other housekeeping chips by removing a 1R resistor:
https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/vendor- ... 54152.html
That should be an easy mod to implement in my current setups and will be one of the next ones I do. Also Peter used the technique also shared on the DIYAudio main DAM thread to use an output transistor to convert the final stage VREF 3.3V regulators into mini-Superregs. Even though I know this will be replaced by the direct LiFePO4/Ultracap power at some point, it is worth trying now to see what other sonic gains are available in a standard-powered setup. I'll report how I make out on these.
Then there are the other mods that AFAIK pretty much only people here have tried that I haven't implemented yet...
- Replacing the FPGA to shift-register ceramic coupling caps with SMD film caps.
- Bypassing and removing the I2S isolator chips.
I'm assuming both of these will provide some level of increased resolution. My question to those of you that have done these (looking at you Nigel and Randy), what level in resolution increase did you hear doing these mods?
Then of course there is using later and improved filters. I'm using the last filters posted on Paul's dead and lamented DAM DAC website, which I felt were definite improvements over the stock filters at the time. Since that time additional ones have been been developed and made available on the DIYAudio thread (here:
https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/digital ... 2r-29.html ) AND Soren has release new firmware increasing the available size of the filter and new filters to go with them, though comments on the main DAM thread indicate the firmware still contains some bugs. So I may play with some of the crowd-sourced filters until Soren has debugged the firmware. BUT my (now distant) impression from going to Paul's filters over Soren's stock ones is that they provided some minor yet worthwhile improvements, but the level of improvement in overall resolution was minor at best.
Finally, I don't know if any of you caught this... In this post:
https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/vendor- ... 41476.html
... Soren mentions that the firmware for the DAM1941 and his other recently-release boards/products with an on-board USB interface go into a FIXED CLOCK MODE when using that interface (and if you did and mentioned it here, I've missed it). THAT could mean (if we lobby Soren a LOT) that could be made a hidden option for the DAM1021/1121 boards, which would open the door to use of better fixed clocks AND source sync mode with local flip-flop-based reclockers. My gut feel is that there's a lot of resolution left on the table with Soren's clock choice(s), clocking scheme, and the FPGA-based reclocking on the DAM1021 (which some comments by Soren suggest was supplemented by off-FPGA reclocking on the DAM1121, but I've never seen definite confirmation). Shall we start a groundswell on this? I'd be willing to pay a reasonable fee for Soren to implement this, perhaps as a 'limited release' or 'undocumented' mod. Anyone else?
Greg in Mississippi
P.S. I forgot to ask, anything else I should consider on improving the DAM1021's? I HAVE thought about going to the DAM1121, especially if he makes more with the 570 clock, but that's a pretty expensive option.