mqn as in mqn.exe 6 months ago. hahalekt wrote:what mqn, KS?jesuscheung wrote:...mqn is totally opposite. needs nothing to sound analog. hehe. shocked when i first heard it
now mqn is 2 PC setup. cannot get it to sound good. give up.
mqn as in mqn.exe 6 months ago. hahalekt wrote:what mqn, KS?jesuscheung wrote:...mqn is totally opposite. needs nothing to sound analog. hehe. shocked when i first heard it
hehe... let me make phone call to bill gate.... he said he is replacing you as the head of department of windows audio.lekt wrote:could you re-write MS wasapi code (for exclusive mode) then wasapi will be better than currently KS software players now, hehe...
i tried use SSE2 (in first lekt versions, didn't try SSE4), bad result, now forgot about SSE, very hard control of soundstage. some settings in compiler also give more vibration, but bad soundstage, there's false vibration, smooth = noise.jesuscheung wrote:i notice one interesting thing. software players that use intel SSE has very unstable soundstage. always changing.
non-SSE software players much more stable.
SSE has one best weapon- airy+smooth.
do you think you can beat SSE in airy+smooth? xa1060a makes sound very very airy/smooth/shiny/oily. seems unreal
2.67 and 2.67.1 are actually my favorite type of soundstage. it makes me focus on music. this soundstage usually gives max-micro details and has least issues.lekt wrote: intel SSE technologue good for computer performance but maybe not good for audio. as i said you, transfer audio data must be: fast (enough speed, ignore latency) + regularly (stable electrical elements)...
.....
uploaded v2.67 256 , v2.67.1 256 , improved vibration. i prefer v2.67, feel very good emotion of vocal, sweet and romantic. v2.67.1 more clean. try them and enjoy!
v2.67 have little intense. i think 2 these versions have normal height but sound need more rising up.jesuscheung wrote:2.67 makes me start to think my service tweaks is wrong. going to redo it this weekend.
2.67 feels very correct.
2.67 and 2.67.1 height enough?