Page 82 of 804

Re: MQN

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:27 am
by iori
iori wrote:the file paste.exe referenced by MQn.bat behaved differently in Win 7 and Win 8.
In Win 8, a "carriage return line feed" is added to the end of the filename inside param.txt.
In Win 7, there is no "carriage return line feed" at the end of the filename. The results in a blank Files.txt
the test on paste.exe was conducted under Win 7 32bit, strange.
Under Win 7 x64, had to rem the sections containing the line with "sort param.txt ....",;
line paste > param.txt was amended to paste > File1.txt

Now it works in Win 7 x64. Sorry a bit confusing.

Re: MQN

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 9:17 am
by DJ le Roi
sima66 wrote:
sbgk wrote:just uploaded 2.66 sse2 intel dqa dqa, sounds quite good to me.
I can't believe it that we could got better bass then V3!!
This (baby talk) version is huge improvement in every aspect. Not just different, but the best one so far and the most complete.
Wow....
Thanks man!
I agree, imho it is the best. Thanks!

Re: MQN

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 10:43 am
by erin
jesuscheung wrote:
people seem interested in tweaks. i shall post 1 tweak a day. try not ask me why and to explain. just tell me if something is wrong/incorrect.

the following tweak i learnt from reading "Performance Tuning Guidelines for Windows Server 2012" from msdn. i just export my registry below:

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\FileSystem]
"SymlinkLocalToRemoteEvaluation"=dword:00000001
"SymlinkLocalToLocalEvaluation"=dword:00000001
"NtfsDisableCompression"=dword:00000000
"DisableDeleteNotification"=dword:00000000
"FilterSupportedFeaturesMode"=dword:00000000
"NtfsDisableEncryption"=dword:00000000
"SymlinkRemoteToRemoteEvaluation"=dword:00000000
"NtfsAllowExtendedCharacter8dot3Rename"=dword:00000000
"NtfsDisable8dot3NameCreation"=dword:00000001
"NtfsDisableLastAccessUpdate"=dword:00000001
"SymlinkRemoteToLocalEvaluation"=dword:00000000
"NtfsQuotaNotifyRate"=dword:00000e10
"NtfsMftZoneReservation"=dword:00000000
"Win31FileSystem"=dword:00000000
"Win95TruncatedExtensions"=dword:00000001
"NtfsEncryptPagingFile"=dword:00000000
"NtfsDisableVolsnapHints"=dword:00000000
"NtfsMemoryUsage"=dword:00000000
"NtfsBugcheckOnCorrupt"=dword:00000000
"ScrubMode"=dword:00000001
"UdfsSoftwareDefectManagement"=dword:00000000
"UdfsCloseSessionOnEject"=dword:00000003
"DontVerifyRandomDrivers"=dword:00000001
"MaximumTunnelEntries"=dword:00000000

i might have modified more values than those in bold. dont remember.

These tweaks were a nice improvement on WS2012. Thank you.
Bass got deeper. Dynamics got bigger. Everything better.

Re: MQN

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 12:06 pm
by erin
Enjoying 2.66 sse2 intel dqa dqa on WS2012.

I went to the Melborune Hi Fi show today
Had fun. I enjoyed the JBL S4700 speakers

Re: MQN

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 12:35 pm
by jkeny
I find 2.66 SSE2 dqa dqa unique in that it is the only player that renders the intro to one of my test tracks correctly (at least I think it is correct).
The test track is track 1 "Court & Spark" from Herbie Hancock's "Letters to Joni".
With all other players (including previous versions of MQN) I hear a brief, varying, low level hiss noise after the strike of each piano chord in the opening section.
I may have talked about this here before & asked about it. Some piano players that I know, heard it & said that it was probably the noise of the pedal usage. It never sounded like a realistic sound to me - I always thought that it was some sort of anomaly, either in the recording or in the playback. Not so long ago I began to wonder if it was noise modulation in the playback system.
Anyway. this version of MQN is the first time that it is gone, I think - I haven't checked it on my main system just through headphones via my laptop.

Here's the intro for all to listen https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BzRUtXo ... sp=sharing

Re: MQN

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 12:37 pm
by nige2000
nige2000 wrote:
cvrle59 wrote: I don't know for how long you listened to 2.67, and what kind of music, but I found that sound is slightly distorted, especially bad recordings like My Generation by Who.
When I started with 2.67 (V1 or V2), it was wow, but more I listen to it less I liked it. So, I decided to hear some bad recording, and I found it was completely unnatural.
So, I went back to 2.59, and after 2.59 to 2.66 V2. They were way more musical and natural presentation. When I listen 2.66 V2 I just don't want to stop listening.
ok will recheck on poorer recordings

tested with Oscar Peterson Trio – You Look Good To Me, My One and Only Love
seemed to be more detail with the piano more fluid

various other stuff for a once over
going to stick to my guns, but funny enough i preferred my generation on 2.66 sse4 v2

2.67 sse4 v1 and 2.66 sse4 v2 and 2.66 sse2 dqa dqa are my favourites

2.66 sse2 dqa dqa is throwing some great punches into the SQ ring

2.66 sse4 v2 might blend better across a range of different tracks

Re: MQN

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 12:44 pm
by nige2000
jkeny wrote:I find 2.66 SSE2 dqa dqa unique in that it is the only player that renders the intro to one of my test tracks correctly (at least I think it is correct).
The test track is track 1 "Court & Spark" from Herbie Hancock's "Letters to Joni".
With all other players (including previous versions of MQN) I hear a brief, varying, low level hiss noise after the strike of each piano chord in the opening section.
I may have talked about this here before & asked about it. Some piano players that I know, heard it & said that it was probably the noise of the pedal usage. It never sounded like a realistic sound to me - I always thought that it was some sort of anomaly, either in the recording or in the playback. Not so long ago I began to wonder if it was noise modulation in the playback system.
Anyway. this version of MQN is the first time that it is gone, I think - I haven't checked it on my main system just through headphones via my laptop.

Here's the intro for all to listen https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BzRUtXo ... sp=sharing

i think the sse2's have the least noise so far,

john
do you think theres any aspects of the sse4's better than this fantastic 2.66 sse2 dqa dqa?

Re: MQN

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 12:49 pm
by Aleg
Just made a first comparison of my favourite 2.66 SSE4 V3 to the newly released 2.66 SSE2 dqa dqa.
I must say it was on my desktop system (JKennyMK3 into Mutex MC-3+ Reclocker into RME UCX into NAIT2 into Helium 400; Transparant Performance USB; 2 Apogee Wideye SPDIF-cables; IC Chord Cobra VEE3) which is not as highly revealing as my main system.

SSE2 dqa dqa is a very beautiful version I could live with any day. Good details, nice airy sound beautiful tonality. Somewhat reduced in depth of soundstage.

SSE4 V3 has more presence in the instruments, a bit more power to them which makes them stand out just that little bit better. But as said before also that somewhat sharper edge which is not present in the SSE2 dqa dqa.

It's getting better and better :-)

Cheers

Aleg

Re: MQN

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 12:54 pm
by nige2000
Aleg wrote:Just made a first comparison of my favourite 2.66 SSE4 V3 to the newly released 2.66 SSE2 dqa dqa.
I must say it was on my desktop system (JKennyMK3 into Mutex MC-3+ Reclocker into RME UCX into NAIT2 into Helium 400; Transparant Performance USB; 2 Apogee Wideye SPDIF-cables; IC Chord Cobra VEE3) which is not as highly revealing as my main system.

SSE2 dqa dqa is a very beautiful version I could live with any day. Good details, nice airy sound beautiful tonality. Somewhat reduced in depth of soundstage.

SSE4 V3 has more presence in the instruments, a bit more power to them which makes them stand out just that little bit better. But as said before also that somewhat sharper edge which is not present in the SSE2 dqa dqa.

It's getting better and better :-)

Cheers

Aleg
hi Aleg

are you using Audiophils script?

i agree that theres a reduction of soundstage with this 2.66 sse2 dqa dqa compared to the best of the sse4's

Re: MQN

Posted: Sat Oct 19, 2013 12:55 pm
by erin
jkeny wrote:I find 2.66 SSE2 dqa dqa unique in that it is the only player that renders the intro to one of my test tracks correctly (at least I think it is correct).
The test track is track 1 "Court & Spark" from Herbie Hancock's "Letters to Joni".
With all other players (including previous versions of MQN) I hear a brief, varying, low level hiss noise after the strike of each piano chord in the opening section.
I may have talked about this here before & asked about it. Some piano players that I know, heard it & said that it was probably the noise of the pedal usage. It never sounded like a realistic sound to me - I always thought that it was some sort of anomaly, either in the recording or in the playback. Not so long ago I began to wonder if it was noise modulation in the playback system.
Anyway. this version of MQN is the first time that it is gone, I think - I haven't checked it on my main system just through headphones via my laptop.

Here's the intro for all to listen https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BzRUtXo ... sp=sharing

Wow, brief low level? I hear it about as loud as the note being played! (in the right chanel) To me it sounds like a worn out old master tape that someone spilled their toast with jam on it! Do you have the LP? Is the sound on the LP?