Page 777 of 804

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 6:58 pm
by elaprince
minionas wrote:You had no 'out' folder therefore you weren't getting multiple files rewritten inside it..

Here it is working as supposed.
Sorry it doesn't work
It rewrite only one file and still I get test.wav inside mqnrewrite folder
It shows all files rewritten in out folder but only one is actually valid rest are 0mb
Thanks

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:02 pm
by minionas
Hm..paste.exe in 'mqnrewrite' folder?

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:32 pm
by minionas
Also noticed rewriter correctly working with only latin letters in file names..

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:43 pm
by elaprince
I just find out that not enough storage on drive C
So next question is is there a way to change directory to D for example?
I try to modified mqn.bat file but getting errors
Thanks

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:48 pm
by minionas
Thats already up to sbgk i guess:)

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:51 pm
by sbgk
elaprince wrote:I just find out that not enough storage on drive C
So next question is is there a way to change directory to D for example?
I try to modified mqn.bat file but getting errors
Thanks
hardcoded to c at the moment, will do a d drive version.

you will need to edit the .bat file as well from c to d.

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:54 pm
by sbgk
uploaded rewrite v5, was doubtful about the benefits, but this one has greater authority. Does a memory to memory write so will take a bit longer.

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:55 pm
by elaprince
Thank you Gordon

Re: MQN

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 11:07 pm
by sbgk
uploaded loader v79, control v94 and rewrite v7, think I found something that improves the sq.

v80/v95/v9 trying different amounts of data to copy each loop, in theory this might be optimal. Better balance anyway.

uploaded v81/v96/v13 think this gives the best sq, has been interesting playing about with these. Seems the instructions used, size of loop etc affects the data stored in the wav file in some way, something that's not addressed by any commercial product that I know of.

uploaded mqnplay v220, it has a sample size of 128 bytes so may not work for everyone, thought I'd try and see what the smallest I could get. It played with 2 byte sample size, but the memory shot up and the system froze.

128 bytes is 0.000725 s, ie 0.725 ms, might be of interest to daw users.

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2016 1:21 am
by elaprince
sbgk wrote:uploaded loader v79, control v94 and rewrite v7, think I found something that improves the sq.

v80/v95/v9 trying different amounts of data to copy each loop, in theory this might be optimal. Better balance anyway.

uploaded v81/v96/v13 think this gives the best sq, has been interesting playing about with these. Seems the instructions used, size of loop etc affects the data stored in the wav file in some way, something that's not addressed by any commercial product that I know of.

uploaded mqnplay v220, it has a sample size of 128 bytes so may not work for everyone, thought I'd try and see what the smallest I could get. It played with 2 byte sample size, but the memory shot up and the system froze.

128 bytes is 0.000725 s, ie 0.725 ms, might be of interest to daw users.
Neither v220 128bytes or v221 881bytes works here
I get sound but it is distorted
Thanks