Page 775 of 804
Re: MQN
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 11:58 pm
by grisaia
sbgk wrote:tried to simplify the install
download mqn haswell.zip
extract the files to c:\musicplayer
if you use another directory change the directory in mqn.bat
@echo off
cd c:\musicplayer
Title MQn - Just good music
then double click setupmqnparam.bat and close the window manually
decide which version of mqnplay is required win 10 or w2012 r2 (also works for win 8.1)
rename the selected mqnplay.exe and mqnloader.exe and mqncontrol.exe files so the description suffix is removed
select wav files/copy to clipboard and double click mqn.bat to play the music
more details on how to play non wav files here
http://randytsuch-audio.blogspot.co.uk/ ... setup.html
Do we still have to use hex editor to modify device string?
Re: MQN
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 12:37 am
by sbgk
grisaia wrote:sbgk wrote:tried to simplify the install
download mqn haswell.zip
extract the files to c:\musicplayer
if you use another directory change the directory in mqn.bat
@echo off
cd c:\musicplayer
Title MQn - Just good music
then double click setupmqnparam.bat and close the window manually
decide which version of mqnplay is required win 10 or w2012 r2 (also works for win 8.1)
rename the selected mqnplay.exe and mqnloader.exe and mqncontrol.exe files so the description suffix is removed
select wav files/copy to clipboard and double click mqn.bat to play the music
more details on how to play non wav files here
http://randytsuch-audio.blogspot.co.uk/ ... setup.html
Do we still have to use hex editor to modify device string?
no, the above steps is all you need to do.
the device string is stored in mqnparam.txt which is created/overwritten when you run setupmqnparam.bat
Re: MQN
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 10:37 am
by Aleg
218/91/72
Bass is too fat and out of balance to other tonal ranges and becomes too overpowering.
217/89/70 was better balanced
Re: MQN
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 11:44 am
by sbgk
Aleg wrote:218/91/72
Bass is too fat and out of balance to other tonal ranges and becomes too overpowering.
217/89/70 was better balanced
did you try 217/90/71, have put them back up ?
Re: MQN
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:06 pm
by Aleg
sbgk wrote:Aleg wrote:218/91/72
Bass is too fat and out of balance to other tonal ranges and becomes too overpowering.
217/89/70 was better balanced
did you try 217/90/71, have put them back up ?
217/90/71 isn't so overpowering, but still prefer 217/89/70.
In 90/71 the bass becomes less distinct, loses some of the definition that is so nicely present in 89/70.
Am using Schubert Rosamunde string quartet played by Alban Berg quartet, and listen to the balance between the first / second violin and the cello. The cello has a clear role but with 218 it overpowers the first/second violin and disturbs the balance of the piece.
Re: MQN
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 1:15 pm
by sbgk
Aleg wrote:sbgk wrote:Aleg wrote:218/91/72
Bass is too fat and out of balance to other tonal ranges and becomes too overpowering.
217/89/70 was better balanced
did you try 217/90/71, have put them back up ?
217/90/71 isn't so overpowering, but still prefer 217/89/70.
In 90/71 the bass becomes less distinct, loses some of the definition that is so nicely present in 89/70.
Am using Schubert Rosamunde string quartet played by Alban Berg quartet, and listen to the balance between the first / second violin and the cello. The cello has a clear role but with 218 it overpowers the first/second violin and disturbs the balance of the piece.
ok, thanks
Re: MQN
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 1:59 pm
by sbgk
tried a rewrite program and managed to get a reduction in treble. Shall try and get a good version and a bad version. The bad version can be used for testing regenerators etc, if the treble is restored then the regenerator is working. If the regenerators can't restore the treble then there is some other mechanism at work that affects the sound.
Re: MQN
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 7:44 pm
by janh
Aleg wrote:
217/90/71 isn't so overpowering, but still prefer 217/89/70.
In 90/71 the bass becomes less distinct, loses some of the definition that is so nicely present in 89/70.
+1.
217/89/70 is very fine, giving a nice sound.
Re: MQN
Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 4:22 pm
by sbgk
building on v217, v219 is more free flowing, sounds good with jazz, anyway.
Re: MQN
Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 6:03 pm
by Aleg
sbgk wrote:building on v217, v219 is more free flowing, sounds good with jazz, anyway.
Get an application error with mqnloader v73 at instruction 0x4000103b referencing 0x09d87000 memory could not be written. Only loads first track.
Is on win 2012r2