Re: MQN
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2015 11:50 pm
SSE4 users still lurking in the shadows ;)
As everyone is looking for a hardware solution these days, I wonder if the future of MQn is as a high quality laptop/pc player using the headphone socket from the internal soundcard.John Dot wrote:SSE4 users still lurking in the shadows ;)
Everybody is looking for a silver bullet, which doesn't exist IMHO.sbgk wrote:As everyone is looking for a hardware solution these days, I wonder if the future of MQn is as a high quality laptop/pc player using the headphone socket from the internal soundcard.John Dot wrote:SSE4 users still lurking in the shadows ;)
Now realise that the play via the headphone was using wavert instead of wave cyclic, so probably why it sounded good. Wasapi takes care of that side of things, but a bit more difficult in kernel streaming mode.
Completely agree there is no such thing as silver bullet software that cures any of the hardware flawsAleg wrote:Everybody is looking for a silver bullet, which doesn't exist IMHO.sbgk wrote:As everyone is looking for a hardware solution these days, I wonder if the future of MQn is as a high quality laptop/pc player using the headphone socket from the internal soundcard.John Dot wrote:SSE4 users still lurking in the shadows ;)
Now realise that the play via the headphone was using wavert instead of wave cyclic, so probably why it sounded good. Wasapi takes care of that side of things, but a bit more difficult in kernel streaming mode.
Best result is achieved by combination of good software and good hardware.
Choice for one without the other is always suboptimal IMHO.
+1nige2000 wrote:Completely agree there is no such thing as silver bullet software that cures any of the hardware flawsAleg wrote:Everybody is looking for a silver bullet, which doesn't exist IMHO.sbgk wrote:
As everyone is looking for a hardware solution these days.....
Wasapi takes care of that side of things, but a bit more difficult in kernel streaming mode.
Best result is achieved by combination of good software and good hardware.
Choice for one without the other is always suboptimal IMHO.
In fact I would suggest that using poorish hardware for development and testing of the software considerably limits it's own potential
Gordonsbgk wrote:uploaded control v22 and play v148, be interested if it works on other dacs, works on mine. very sensitive to other things happening on the computer at which point it'll play at half speed.
may be able to get it working for other dacs if there is a problem.
Using the two latest files, playback is running OK here.sbgk wrote:uploaded control v22 and play v148, be interested if it works on other dacs, works on mine. very sensitive to other things happening on the computer at which point it'll play at half speed.
may be able to get it working for other dacs if there is a problem.
Mqnplay v148 and counter v23 play fine here. My PC is also a dedicated musicplayer machine.sbgk wrote:uploaded control v22 and play v148, be interested if it works on other dacs, works on mine. very sensitive to other things happening on the computer at which point it'll play at half speed.
may be able to get it working for other dacs if there is a problem.
+1 without problems - and I often have.sbgk wrote:uploaded control v22 and play v148, be interested if it works on other dacs, works on mine. very sensitive to other things happening on the computer at which point it'll play at half speed.
may be able to get it working for other dacs if there is a problem.