Re: What are you listening to?
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:00 pm
You have the whole cycle Fergus?fergus wrote:
I need to play mine again soon as it didn't register highly with me on first listen
You have the whole cycle Fergus?fergus wrote:
I like those performances very muchfergus wrote:The Brahms four symphonies under Klemperer....
That's a hard set to beat in that repertoire. I think it has a few fans on this forum - I am also obliged at this point to signpost the radiant Kubelik BRSO cycle as a wonderful set to play alongside this Sawallisch.fergus wrote:
although now that I hear it... I may actually prefer Op.3Jose Echenique wrote:I favor the Giardino Armonico version because of it´s stunning lineup of violinists, including Enrico Onofri and Fabrizio Cipriani.jaybee wrote:I have the HM version of that with Andrew Manze and the AAM.... lovely!fergus wrote:
The music is wonderfully well played with sparkle and style and also with vitality and feeling where appropriate. It is a great recording as well: the authentic instruments sound very full.
I haven't tried many but I did buy the HvK 1961 reading in the hope it might yield Brahms' secrets. I have heard a couple of others now including Harnoncourt and Dorati. But - this is just my thoughts - it seems to be a weak symphony when stood against the dynamism of his 4th (speaking of the Carlos Kleiber reckoning at least) with the hauntingly warm slow movement then that glittering Scherzo; or the 1st Symphony with its sense of scale, forward drive with some lovely themes and a superb ending.Jared wrote:Have you tried the MacKerras set yet? Well worth owning.Dane wrote:I've been trying with the Harnoncourt Brahms 3 but put it down again.
With winter approaching there'll be time to have another go.
For a more traditional version, I plumped for the HvK 70's and the Jochum, both of which I'm happy with.
Dear Pepe, you really do get to attend some wonderful concerts, I hope that you enjoy it.Jose Echenique wrote: Since next november 17 I´ll be hearing the Missa Solemnis with John Eliot Gardiner.
Sawallisch's Schumann is marvellous and his Brahms is awful! Kubelik is marvellous full stop.bombasticDarren wrote:That's a hard set to beat in that repertoire. I think it has a few fans on this forum - I am also obliged at this point to signpost the radiant Kubelik BRSO cycle as a wonderful set to play alongside this Sawallisch.fergus wrote:
If Kubelik had conducted the Rolling Stones he would still be marvelous, I can´t think of anything where he was not marvelous...Verdi, Mahler, Schumann, Schubert, Beethoven, Dvorak...you name it.Seán wrote:Sawallisch's Schumann is marvellous and his Brahms is awful! Kubelik is marvellous full stop.bombasticDarren wrote:That's a hard set to beat in that repertoire. I think it has a few fans on this forum - I am also obliged at this point to signpost the radiant Kubelik BRSO cycle as a wonderful set to play alongside this Sawallisch.fergus wrote: