Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2015 8:11 am
uploaded v6, hopefully good for win 2012 r2 / win 8.1
v7 has better treble
v7 has better treble
Yeselaprince wrote:Gordon is this still Haswell ??
Thanks
once I get the functionality added back in it's too big a change to get it working for non haswell, it's just at the back of the queue.elaprince wrote:Damn
I guess I have to throw some cash for Haswell hardware
Thank you
It (ldn v6 and ldn v7) is definitely a big change compared to ldn v3, for the better as well.sbgk wrote:I tried smaller buffers and there does seem to be more definition or rather the balance is shifted to enhanced treble. CPU % goes up as there is more work involved with smaller buffers.
I mean't not too big a changesbgk wrote:once I get the functionality added back in it's too big a change to get it working for non haswell, it's just at the back of the queue.elaprince wrote:Damn
I guess I have to throw some cash for Haswell hardware
Thank you
early days, shall find out how it behaves.Aleg wrote:It (ldn v6 and ldn v7) is definitely a big change compared to ldn v3, for the better as well.sbgk wrote:I tried smaller buffers and there does seem to be more definition or rather the balance is shifted to enhanced treble. CPU % goes up as there is more work involved with smaller buffers.
I have not yet made up my mind on its merits.
I hear what it does, and how it has changed, but I don't yet know what to think of it.
It is all you say it is, but it is again so different, each aspect seems to have 'extra'. I almost feel it is too much of everything.
Maybe I have to get used to it, to adapt myself again to it, as I have been listening a lot of internet radio lately, so not the best quality.
It is an unexpected and surprisingly big change again.
Well done for that.
I have to listen to various styles of music with it and see what it does with each .....
I'm a bit confused by this one.