Page 703 of 804

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2015 8:11 am
by sbgk
uploaded v6, hopefully good for win 2012 r2 / win 8.1

v7 has better treble

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:03 pm
by elaprince
Gordon is this still Haswell ??
Thanks

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:08 pm
by sbgk
elaprince wrote:Gordon is this still Haswell ??
Thanks
Yes

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:09 pm
by elaprince
Damn
I guess I have to throw some cash for Haswell hardware
Thank you

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:14 pm
by sbgk
elaprince wrote:Damn
I guess I have to throw some cash for Haswell hardware
Thank you
once I get the functionality added back in it's too big a change to get it working for non haswell, it's just at the back of the queue.

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:17 pm
by sbgk
I tried smaller buffers and there does seem to be more definition or rather the balance is shifted to enhanced treble. CPU % goes up as there is more work involved with smaller buffers.

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2015 4:38 pm
by Aleg
sbgk wrote:I tried smaller buffers and there does seem to be more definition or rather the balance is shifted to enhanced treble. CPU % goes up as there is more work involved with smaller buffers.
It (ldn v6 and ldn v7) is definitely a big change compared to ldn v3, for the better as well.

I have not yet made up my mind on its merits.
I hear what it does, and how it has changed, but I don't yet know what to think of it.
It is all you say it is, but it is again so different, each aspect seems to have 'extra'. I almost feel it is too much of everything.
Maybe I have to get used to it, to adapt myself again to it, as I have been listening a lot of internet radio lately, so not the best quality.

It is an unexpected and surprisingly big change again.
Well done for that.

I have to listen to various styles of music with it and see what it does with each .....

I'm a bit confused by this one.

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2015 6:37 pm
by sbgk
sbgk wrote:
elaprince wrote:Damn
I guess I have to throw some cash for Haswell hardware
Thank you
once I get the functionality added back in it's too big a change to get it working for non haswell, it's just at the back of the queue.
I mean't not too big a change

Re: MQN

Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2015 6:38 pm
by sbgk
Aleg wrote:
sbgk wrote:I tried smaller buffers and there does seem to be more definition or rather the balance is shifted to enhanced treble. CPU % goes up as there is more work involved with smaller buffers.
It (ldn v6 and ldn v7) is definitely a big change compared to ldn v3, for the better as well.

I have not yet made up my mind on its merits.
I hear what it does, and how it has changed, but I don't yet know what to think of it.
It is all you say it is, but it is again so different, each aspect seems to have 'extra'. I almost feel it is too much of everything.
Maybe I have to get used to it, to adapt myself again to it, as I have been listening a lot of internet radio lately, so not the best quality.

It is an unexpected and surprisingly big change again.
Well done for that.

I have to listen to various styles of music with it and see what it does with each .....

I'm a bit confused by this one.
early days, shall find out how it behaves.

Re: MQN

Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2015 1:19 pm
by sbgk
uploaded v8, probably the final version in terms of sq