Page 656 of 804
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 8:25 pm
by sbgk
sebna wrote:Adam do you use your MQN with MQNLoader? I am asking as I am and I am wondering if re-writer benefits still apply if the file is converted on the fly to wave and copied between HDD and CF.
I am temporarily without audio-pc while waiting for new parts to arrive so cannot test it myself.
Gordon have you maybe received your new SPDIF converter? How do you like it if you have it already?
Cheers
just received the u12 today, sounds like a new digital device, hopefully will open up and be less thin, but think it's showing promise, quite compelling, timing and insight seems good so far. same xmos chip and similar clocks as the berkeley alpha $1800 device, with scope for diy upgrades.
am going to get a chance to compare MQn to an upgraded LP12, so shall see how far apart it is.
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:02 am
by sbgk
control 3.96 avx2 is first attempt at a rewrite type method, think it's different, hopefully can be improved upon.
what is going on is anyone's guess, this one uses memcpy, shall try assembly code next.
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:19 am
by rickmcinnis
Fujak wrote:rickmcinnis wrote:When using the newer versions of play and control is there any change in the "screen"?
Does it look as it always has or is it abbreviated?
My cmd screen occurs after starting a file, and disappears after few seconds. I find this behaviour very useful.
Regards - Fujak
Thanks for your response,
Been working on the audio computer while my DAC is out of service along with my OS experiments and was worried something was going horribly wrong.
I do need to verify there is something happening but this is very helpful and I completely agree - the screen going away is beneficial.
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:21 am
by rickmcinnis
sbgk wrote:sebna wrote:Adam do you use your MQN with MQNLoader? I am asking as I am and I am wondering if re-writer benefits still apply if the file is converted on the fly to wave and copied between HDD and CF.
I am temporarily without audio-pc while waiting for new parts to arrive so cannot test it myself.
Gordon have you maybe received your new SPDIF converter? How do you like it if you have it already?
Cheers
just received the u12 today, sounds like a new digital device, hopefully will open up and be less thin, but think it's showing promise, quite compelling, timing and insight seems good so far. same xmos chip and similar clocks as the berkeley alpha $1800 device, with scope for diy upgrades.
am going to get a chance to compare MQn to an upgraded LP12, so shall see how far apart it is.
Well, the LINN can only tell you so much. What phono amp will you use out of curiosity? And you might as well tell us the arm/cartridge of choice.
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:43 am
by sbgk
rickmcinnis wrote:sbgk wrote:sebna wrote:Adam do you use your MQN with MQNLoader? I am asking as I am and I am wondering if re-writer benefits still apply if the file is converted on the fly to wave and copied between HDD and CF.
I am temporarily without audio-pc while waiting for new parts to arrive so cannot test it myself.
Gordon have you maybe received your new SPDIF converter? How do you like it if you have it already?
Cheers
just received the u12 today, sounds like a new digital device, hopefully will open up and be less thin, but think it's showing promise, quite compelling, timing and insight seems good so far. same xmos chip and similar clocks as the berkeley alpha $1800 device, with scope for diy upgrades.
am going to get a chance to compare MQn to an upgraded LP12, so shall see how far apart it is.
Well, the LINN can only tell you so much. What phono amp will you use out of curiosity? And you might as well tell us the arm/cartridge of choice.
don't know, has a keel, so it won't capsize, think he said a naim arm, shall find out.
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:46 am
by sbgk
sbgk wrote:control 3.96 avx2 is first attempt at a rewrite type method, think it's different, hopefully can be improved upon.
what is going on is anyone's guess, this one uses memcpy, shall try assembly code next.
3.97 better way of doing memcpy
3.98 using intrinsic rep movsq command
rewriter claim was that using non temporal instructions improved things, shall see.
in theory memcpy should use non temporal instructions, 3.97 sounds ok, 3.98 a bit less so.
amazing stuff.
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:15 pm
by Clive
Can the new controls be used with the older mqns which work with most DACs?
As I don't have a DAC on the list of recent mqn versions I've not tried new versions recently. I must admit I've not totally followed where we're up to...
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:47 pm
by Ken Moreland
3.97 avx2 works very well for me on Chord Hugo.
KM
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:16 pm
by cvrle59
Ken Moreland wrote:3.97 avx2 works very well for me on Chord Hugo.
KM
+1
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:20 pm
by sbgk
Clive wrote:Can the new controls be used with the older mqns which work with most DACs?
As I don't have a DAC on the list of recent mqn versions I've not tried new versions recently. I must admit I've not totally followed where we're up to...
think so