Page 640 of 804

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:48 pm
by tony
I can't keep up! trying out 3.78avx2 with 3.93 avx2 x2dev on Ciunas and sounds really detailed.
Wow the extra body using these versions on Ciunas with Spendors really good.

Nigel have you tried any of these specific device versions??

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:50 pm
by sbgk
uploaded tf and oct versions

that's it for now, next version will be the auto device version

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2014 10:31 pm
by TioFrancotirdor
Thanks Gordon!

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2014 10:56 pm
by Ken Moreland
Hi Gordon , is there an 8.94 dev aa version ? Can't see it on the Google Drive.
KM

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2014 11:10 pm
by sbgk
Ken Moreland wrote:Hi Gordon , is there an 8.94 dev aa version ? Can't see it on the Google Drive.
KM
after extensive testing it was found to be too bass heavy, so am on to 3.82/8.95 which is a thing of beauty and a joy forever. Listening to Astral Weeks and think it renders the atmospherics pretty well.

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2014 11:12 pm
by Ken Moreland
Thanks, got 8.95 avx2 dev aa, will report tomorrow.
K

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 12:50 am
by tony
Ken Moreland wrote:Thanks, got 8.95 avx2 dev aa, will report tomorrow.
K
Think you might like it Ken not a bad effort by Master Gordon

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 1:15 am
by sbgk
tony wrote:
Ken Moreland wrote:Thanks, got 8.95 avx2 dev aa, will report tomorrow.
K
Think you might like it Ken not a bad effort by Master Gordon
3.83/8.96 seems a good compromise between detail and bass.

3.81/8.94 is in archive if you want thumping bass

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 3:46 am
by cvrle59
sbgk wrote:
tony wrote:
Ken Moreland wrote:Thanks, got 8.95 avx2 dev aa, will report tomorrow.
K
Think you might like it Ken not a bad effort by Master Gordon
3.83/8.96 seems a good compromise between detail and bass.

3.81/8.94 is in archive if you want thumping bass
It could be just me, but I prefer 3.74/aa 3 over 3.83/8.96.
Incredable depth...it chellanges DSD, if not better. I guess, how DSD MQn would sound like...:)

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2014 1:08 pm
by Ken Moreland
Playing 3.83/8.96 and the sound is top dollar. As George/cvrle59 says it's right up there with DSD, lots of detail , huge soundstage and good bass but overall the atmosphere is superb.
Here's a good article from TAS http://www.theabsolutesound.com/article ... rformance/ . especially the correlation between apparent performer height with sound quality.
KM