Page 609 of 804
Re: MQN
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 8:54 pm
by jrling
Aleg wrote:Diapason wrote:Pshaw that's far too easy. If we're staying in the spirit of the forum it has to be VI.
once upon a time, I was fluent in VI, thirty odd years ago :-(
+1!!
Re: MQN
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 11:27 pm
by james
Diapason wrote:Pshaw that's far too easy. If we're staying in the spirit of the forum it has to be VI.
Surely emacs rather than vi !!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Editor_war
Re: MQN
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2014 11:46 pm
by tony
I thought Fryderck had cracked the unix thing? Remember people being bowled over by his laptop linux os with minimal player
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:16 am
by sbgk
uploaded 8.54, updated version based on 8.16 so should work for everyone. Listening to it, it sounds great.
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:23 pm
by jrling
tony wrote:I thought Fryderck had cracked the unix thing? Remember people being bowled over by his laptop linux os with minimal player
Any chance of a link to it?
Thanks
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 6:17 pm
by John Dot
sbgk wrote:uploaded 8.54, updated version based on 8.16 so should work for everyone. Listening to it, it sounds great.
No sound at all...
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 7:34 pm
by Aleg
John Dot wrote:sbgk wrote:uploaded 8.54, updated version based on 8.16 so should work for everyone. Listening to it, it sounds great.
No sound at all...
Just plays fine here, as is 8.55.
Don't feel it is an upgrade to 8.51 though apart from solving the vinyl like ticks
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 9:02 pm
by jrling
Aleg wrote:John Dot wrote:sbgk wrote:uploaded 8.54, updated version based on 8.16 so should work for everyone. Listening to it, it sounds great.
No sound at all...
Just plays fine here, as is 8.55.
Don't feel it is an upgrade to 8.51 though apart from solving the vinyl like ticks
My previous reference was 8.16 Normal. 8.54 Normal has def taken over as my new reference. Outstanding detail but warmth.
Can 16/44.1 get any better than this? Well probably, but difficult to believe.
Jonathan
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 10:46 pm
by sbgk
uploaded 8.55, tuned version of 8.54, might be more musical
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 11:50 pm
by sbgk
8.57 is same code as 8.55 with optimised alignment, makes a difference.
I'm going to say that as a result of the improved alignment the timing is bang on, just sounds right.
seems alignment is more important than i'd realised, listen to 8.58.
8.59 seems optimal, like hearing a guitar in tune, it just sings.
in assembly the code before a loop is read each time it loops round, so it's not only important to have the start of the loop aligned it's also important which instruction is before the loop, would you believe. That's the only difference between 8.58 and 8.59 if you want proof (you'll have to use your ears though).
wonder if anyone would be interested in using mqn for recording music, would it have the same effect as heard in playback.