Page 608 of 1005
Re: What are you listening to?
Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 7:56 pm
by fergus
Jared wrote:
Simply not good enough Mr Fergus... that's rampant, naked favouritism...
LOL!!!
For me one of the acid tests of a conductor is how they get on with a Beethoven cycle. However Walter is a firm favourite with me so this was not an issue in this case; I simply did not have a Beethoven cycle by him.
There are at least two more Beethoven cycles on the List yet to be purshased!
Re: What are you listening to?
Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 8:09 pm
by bombasticDarren
Stravinsky -
Symphonies of Wind instruments &
La Sacre du Printemps (Kent Nagano, London Symphony Orchestra, Virgin Classics)
Re: What are you listening to?
Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 8:10 pm
by bombasticDarren
fergus wrote:Jared wrote:
Simply not good enough Mr Fergus... that's rampant, naked favouritism...
LOL!!!
For me one of the acid tests of a conductor is how they get on with a Beethoven cycle. However Walter is a firm favourite with me so this was not an issue in this case; I simply did not have a Beethoven cycle by him.
There are at least two more Beethoven cycles on the List yet to be purshased!
I agree with your arguments there Fergus. Which cycles are there still left for you to purchase?
Re: What are you listening to?
Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 9:19 pm
by bombasticDarren
Saint-Saens - Piano Concerto No.2 (Emil Gilels/Andre Cluytens, Orchestre de la Societe des Concerts du Conservatoire, EMI)
Re: What are you listening to?
Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 9:56 pm
by fergus
bombasticDarren wrote:Stravinsky -
Symphonies of Wind instruments &
La Sacre du Printemps (Kent Nagano, London Symphony Orchestra, Virgin Classics)
How did you get on with that one Darren? Nagano is not a conductor that I am familiar with.
Re: What are you listening to?
Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 9:57 pm
by fergus
bombasticDarren wrote:fergus wrote:Jared wrote:
Simply not good enough Mr Fergus... that's rampant, naked favouritism...
LOL!!!
For me one of the acid tests of a conductor is how they get on with a Beethoven cycle. However Walter is a firm favourite with me so this was not an issue in this case; I simply did not have a Beethoven cycle by him.
There are at least two more Beethoven cycles on the List yet to be purshased!
I agree with your arguments there Fergus.
Which cycles are there still left for you to purchase?
I will definitely buy the Furtwangler set Darren and I am considering the Chailly cycle. I have heard it but I am not fully convinced by it....I will see.
Re: What are you listening to?
Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 9:59 pm
by fergus
I have finally completed my first full listen of the Ring with Gotterdammerung....
This is a very lyrical and very appealing work and there are some really wonderful pieces of music in this opera.
Re: What are you listening to?
Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 10:54 pm
by Ciaran
Re: What are you listening to?
Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 12:03 am
by Seán
fergus wrote:bombasticDarren wrote:fergus wrote:
LOL!!!
For me one of the acid tests of a conductor is how they get on with a Beethoven cycle. However Walter is a firm favourite with me so this was not an issue in this case; I simply did not have a Beethoven cycle by him.
There are at least two more Beethoven cycles on the List yet to be purshased!
I agree with your arguments there Fergus.
Which cycles are there still left for you to purchase?
I will definitely buy the Furtwangler set Darren and I am considering the Chailly cycle. I have heard it but I am not fully convinced by it....I will see.
Hi Fergus, have you given any consideration to getting the Vänskä/Minnesota Orchestra cycle? It is very good. I will give the Chailly a miss, I have heard some of it and it doesn't move me. I will get the Walter & Furtwangler sets but I won't join you on your Beethoven quest at this time, enjoy.
Re: What are you listening to?
Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 1:58 am
by Jose Echenique
I wasn´t too happy with the Chailly either Seán, and feel very frustrated because I really wanted a top modern cycle with the great Gewandhaus Orchestra, but it was not to be.