lol:)jrling wrote:I'll cancel my order of a Mac Mini then!
MQN
Re: MQN
"macs are very popular in the us its difficult for them to change :)"
By Nige
That is true, but I see that "Naim community" is heavily infected by macs too, which is mostly in UK. They seems to think, the nicer and most expensive, the better.
I personally haven't compared them, but I do trust to a few people, including Nige. So I don't have desire to go into that adventure, either, especially that I use PC full time at work.
By Nige
That is true, but I see that "Naim community" is heavily infected by macs too, which is mostly in UK. They seems to think, the nicer and most expensive, the better.
I personally haven't compared them, but I do trust to a few people, including Nige. So I don't have desire to go into that adventure, either, especially that I use PC full time at work.
i3 Haswell, PPAStudio USB3 card and USB Micro cable/Chord Hugo/Nad-275BEE/Harbeth-30.1
Re: MQN
I can confirm the view based on what I heard at Nigel's recently.
Maybe if someone had a tricked out mac mini to compare with a windows machine
that might be a fairer comparison.
Mac mini looks the biz and wife factor makes it a no brainer. Pair it with a Devialet
and sure you could put the hifi in a drawer. Couple it with speakers hidden in an outhouse
is nirvana for my boss. Perfect hifi unseen and hopefully no sounds
Maybe if someone had a tricked out mac mini to compare with a windows machine
that might be a fairer comparison.
Mac mini looks the biz and wife factor makes it a no brainer. Pair it with a Devialet
and sure you could put the hifi in a drawer. Couple it with speakers hidden in an outhouse
is nirvana for my boss. Perfect hifi unseen and hopefully no sounds
GroupBuySD DAC/First Watt AlephJ/NigeAmp/Audio PC's/Lampi L4.5 Dac/ Groupbuy AD1862 DHT Dac /Quad ESL63's.Tannoy Legacy Cheviots.
Re: MQN
I have no problem with any of those, but "speakers hidden in an outhouse" would be challenging, if you still want some good sound...:)
i3 Haswell, PPAStudio USB3 card and USB Micro cable/Chord Hugo/Nad-275BEE/Harbeth-30.1
Re: MQN
thing is a mac mini or all newer macs are actually portable pc's since apple moved to intel cpus,tony wrote:I can confirm the view based on what I heard at Nigel's recently.
Maybe if someone had a tricked out mac mini to compare with a windows machine
that might be a fairer comparison.
https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Mac+Min ... down/30410
and since pcs have moved to efi bios there even closer
thats why its never been easier to put mac os on a newish pc
so whats so radically different about a mac mini to make it sound better?
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
Re: MQN
I don't think it is the mini that is the differentiator for the reasons you say. It is just the closest Apple issue to a PC.nige2000 wrote:thing is a mac mini or all newer macs are actually portable pc's since apple moved to intel cpus,tony wrote:I can confirm the view based on what I heard at Nigel's recently.
Maybe if someone had a tricked out mac mini to compare with a windows machine
that might be a fairer comparison.
https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Mac+Min ... down/30410
and since pcs have moved to efi bios there even closer
thats why its never been easier to put mac os on a newish pc
so whats so radically different about a mac mini to make it sound better?
My point was that the differences are:
Audio stack in OS/X (based on Linux) v. Windows WDM-KS
Native support for UAC2
MQn v. Audirvana
My (ill-informed) view is that the Apple audio stack is potentially superior to WDM-KS. Integer and Direct Modes do seem to be getting as close to direct pass through as may be achievable in OS/X
Removing the need for another layer of proprietary driver by providing UAC2 support, has to be a good thing
So I am wondering if it is Audirvana that is causing the poor performance, whereas we know that MQn makes an incredible positive difference as we all have discovered? I presume you ran Audirvana with all Integer/Direct/Exclusive Modes turned on?
Maplin XM21X 12V float charging A123 26650 LiFePO4 battery/Maxwell Supercap PSU for Mitac PD10-BI J1900 Bay Trail, WTFPlay, Hiface Evo, Bow Technologies 1704 NOS DAC, StereoKnight TVC, Quad II monoblocks, ZU Audio Druid Mk4/Method Sub
Re: MQN
just done a audirvana bells whistles etc versus r2 + mqn on the macbook pro
mqn and r2 left mac OS X and audirvana in the dust
most noticeable is the higher noise floor then the lack of detail and dynamics
im not talking about a little difference its pretty huge
so i really don't think I've got it wrong:)
and yes i think audirvana is doing a good job on OS X especially with all the magic settings
your hard to convince:(
thats why i use mac os for emails and internet related stuff
mqn and r2 left mac OS X and audirvana in the dust
most noticeable is the higher noise floor then the lack of detail and dynamics
im not talking about a little difference its pretty huge
so i really don't think I've got it wrong:)
and yes i think audirvana is doing a good job on OS X especially with all the magic settings
your hard to convince:(
thats why i use mac os for emails and internet related stuff
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
-
- Posts: 588
- Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 10:01 pm
Re: MQN
macs are popular in the US as Mao is popular in China - cult of personality with the added panache of fashion accessory.
I have never understood the devotion.
I have never understood the devotion.
phonograph, amplifiers & speakers
Re: MQN
the files are bit identical, what mechanism is at play ? you could copy the contents from one to the other, do they still sound the same ? If you duplicated them and played either both linear or non linear would you think they are different. I played each file in a loop via mqn and after a while couldn't differentiate between the linear and non linear.sima66 wrote:I had a RAMDISK and I didn't like it! It flattened the sound.jrling wrote:As the thread seems to have gone rather quiet (except for noises of followers' computers crashing!), I found this article over on CA fascinating -
http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f8-ge ... ers-18108/
Apologies if it is well known already, but Superdad's description of how he judges SQ was one of the best and most comprehensive that I have read.
Also his findings (albeit on a Mac Mini) on the sonic differences between playing music stored on different types of hard drives was fascinating - mainly that there was such a difference even when the track was in full memory play mode (in RAM) and theoretically therefore hard drive storage would not be accessed during play.
Has anyone tried creating a RAMDisk and running MQn and/or the music from RAMDisk - thereby completely enabling powering down of any onboard HDD whilst music is playing?
Some people had a different experience so is definitely worth to try!
After a bit of reading of this post, I can't agree that copied files sound the same. Even in the same SSD with clean power, I can still hear the difference between the original and the first copy.