Tír Na HiFi

v2.9 1024 sounds very good here.

Looking forward to gapless.

goon-heaven wrote:v2.9 1024 sounds very good here.

Looking forward to gapless.

try v2.9.1 352 and v2.9.2 1024, i think better than 2.9 1024

is your soundcard works with 2.10:
lekt.exe1644 v2.10 test soundcard
lekt.exe1644 v2.10.1 test soundcard
lekt.exe1644 v2.10.2 test soundcard

2.10 in my case better than 2.9 (~20%), pretty vibration.

v2.9.1 352 gross distortion (soundcard has possible buffer sizes 32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4096)
v2.9.2 1024 more detailed, better vibration perhaps compressed - more listening required
v2.10 tests all: no sound

2.9.1 352
-for the first time 352 works!
-i just felt "this sounds right"! it is the same feeling i got for the first time from using XA with 1ms(44), 2ms(88)...8ms(352)...10ms buffers.
-that vocal reveals in maximum details! i have not heard better without the consequence of earaches.
-difficult to compare this with previous versions!!! 88/176/352 is a different sound(much better sound) to previous versions' 1024 for my DAC.
-thx lekt for a custom build for me!

2.9.2 1024
-this versions sounds great. need a 352 version to compare it with.

goon-heaven wrote:v2.9.1 352 gross distortion (soundcard has possible buffer sizes 32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4096)
v2.9.2 1024 more detailed, better vibration perhaps compressed - more listening required
v2.10 tests all: no sound

goon-heaven, what soundcard you got?
i am now convinced every DAC has their own best buffer sizes.

lekt, mind making 44, 88, 176, 352 and a 444 versions for me? must test to make sure.

jesuscheung wrote:

goon-heaven wrote:v2.9.1 352 gross distortion (soundcard has possible buffer sizes 32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4096)
v2.9.2 1024 more detailed, better vibration perhaps compressed - more listening required
v2.10 tests all: no sound

goon-heaven, what soundcard you got?
i am now convinced every DAC has their own best buffer sizes.

lekt, mind making 44, 88, 176, 352 and a 444 versions for me? must test to make sure.

OK, i will do. interesting and effectly, my soundcard seem best with 160. but with 2^n size programing have more benefit in code.
next versions must be better than old. found out something for optimization.

jesuscheung wrote: goon-heaven, what soundcard you got?
i am now convinced every DAC has their own best buffer sizes.
.

RME HDSPe (AES/EBU Digital Out). Buffer sizes 32, 62, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096

have uploaded serial v2.11xx for difference buffer size. there's 3 concept manufacture production DAC:
32^n , 44^n, 40^n
try and choose for best versions for your soundcard and enjoy !

Thanks. 32 crashes. 256+ plays. Are 64 & 128 possible please?

lekt wrote:have uploaded serial v2.11xx for difference buffer size. there's 3 concept manufacture production DAC:
32^n , 44^n, 40^n
try and choose for best versions for your soundcard and enjoy !

thx for the versions.

-44 and 2.88 crash... my DAC can't handle.
-176 plays. good. but dry.
-352 is great. i guess 352 is best buffer for Xonar STX
-702 is quite mellow but less real.

-320 works! for this buffer size for my DAC, lekt has the same SQ issues like XA/foobar/winamp 320/640. bass can be bloated. treble is a little much.

-2.11's guitar is weak! must fix
-2.11 has more vibration than ever.
-2.11 has earaches.
-prefer 2.9.1 is more mellow, more airy, more easy, more emotion!
-2.9.1's guitar is also weak.
-2.9.1's emotion already is excellent is only like 1% less than norm.

i think emotion is best measure for a player. i never heard a player has more emotion than norm. there could be too much bass, treble, noise etc. emotion is never too much.