Tír Na HiFi

sbgk wrote:uploaded 576 version which is 1 ms

No crash, but some strange electronic sound, not music.

Aleg wrote:

sbgk wrote:uploaded 576 version which is 1 ms

No crash, but some strange electronic sound, not music.

maybe you have to be in the JK Cuinas club to get such extreme buffer sizes, 64 does sound very live. cpu up to 5% though.

some missing ingredient has appeared in the last few versions,
didnt get to test the 576 yet
even 8.29 was good
resolution good yippee
maybe definition and dynamic needs a boost
but nice versions all the same

nige2000 wrote:some missing ingredient has appeared in the last few versions,
didnt get to test the 576 yet
even 8.29 was good
resolution good yippee
maybe definition and dynamic needs a boost
but nice versions all the same

If nige is getting excited, then so am I!!

Aleg wrote:

sbgk wrote:uploaded 576 version which is 1 ms

No crash, but some strange electronic sound, not music.

8.30 normal - deep space sounds here.

sbgk wrote:

Aleg wrote:

sbgk wrote:uploaded 576 version which is 1 ms

No crash, but some strange electronic sound, not music.

maybe you have to be in the JK Cuinas club to get such extreme buffer sizes, 64 does sound very live. cpu up to 5% though.

It is starting to look like a private party ;-) : for users with a avx2 capable Haswell with Ciunas using windows 8.1 or over.

Aleg wrote:
It is starting to look like a private party ;-) : for users with a avx2 capable Haswell with Ciunas using windows 8.1 or over.

whats your lowest possible buffer size 3,4,5 ms?

coz its the best bit of progress in a good while, something ultimately better could develop out of this

nige2000 wrote:

Aleg wrote:
It is starting to look like a private party ;-) : for users with a avx2 capable Haswell with Ciunas using windows 8.1 or over.

whats your lowest possible buffer size 3,4,5 ms?

coz its the best bit of progress in a good while, something ultimately better could develop out of this

my driver allows a buffer size of 1ms, I run it at 2ms

3.29 is a big step up already, with the regular packet size.
don't know the relation between buffer and packet size

Aleg wrote:3.29 is a big step up already, with the regular packet size.

Aleg, I guess you mean 8.29. ;-) (although the 3.29 wasn't bad either). Beside this: My lowest buffersize is 1ms, the 576 version works and sounds well!

Fujak wrote:

Aleg wrote:3.29 is a big step up already, with the regular packet size.

Aleg, I guess you mean 8.29. ;-) (although the 3.29 wasn't bad either). Beside this: My lowest buffersize is 1ms, the 576 version works and sounds well!

Fujak, with WaveIO/thesycon ?