MQN

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
John Dot
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 6:19 pm

Re: MQN

Post by John Dot »

jesuscheung wrote:
sima66 wrote:With all due respect for the Gordon's hard work and everybody else's opinions, I must say that either is something wrong with my system, or with myself, but I still can't hear the details, the clarity and the balance of 5.14 in the KS, including the latest 8.16's!
8.16 orig finally works ! overall sound is great
needs more decay

uploaded MQnPlay1644.exe8.16 orig MOD20
https://drive.google.com/?usp=folder&au ... 0plZTNGd0E

PE mod.
agility better. fast notes better.
did try tighten sound further my machine cannot handle.
Don't know if you have SBGK's permission to mod his code, but this one sounds fantastic!
PC: CPU Q8400, 8GB Ram, Windows 8.1 x64
DAC: HRT Music Streamer II+, Asus Xonar Essence ST (+ HiEnd DYI upgrades)
User avatar
Octagon
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:50 pm

Re: MQN 8.16 normal orig

Post by Octagon »

7.41 normal (pa93) > 8.16 normal orig on my system

Less transparency and detail; triangle is getting lost in Griegs "Anitras Dance"...

Good news might be that Gordon might know now why the actual versions don't work with systems like mine? Hope is growing ;)

Cheers
Thomas
Coax tractrix horn system 2 corner subwoofer / 6 full digital amplifier D802 floating PSU 12V battery / digital XO/DRC / 2 PC floating PSU picoless battery/Mutec REF 10/2x Mutec MC3.1+ USB floating PSU 6V/FireFace UCX floating PSU 12V battery/Mutec MC-4
Aleg
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:26 pm

Re: MQN

Post by Aleg »

John Dot wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:
sima66 wrote:With all due respect for the Gordon's hard work and everybody else's opinions, I must say that either is something wrong with my system, or with myself, but I still can't hear the details, the clarity and the balance of 5.14 in the KS, including the latest 8.16's!
8.16 orig finally works ! overall sound is great
needs more decay

uploaded MQnPlay1644.exe8.16 orig MOD20
https://drive.google.com/?usp=folder&au ... 0plZTNGd0E

PE mod.
agility better. fast notes better.
did try tighten sound further my machine cannot handle.
Don't know if you have SBGK's permission to mod his code, but this one sounds fantastic!

The JC-Mod is not capable of showing details in high frequencies like delicate cymbals playing with brushes.
It gives a strange distorted kind of sound instead of clear cymbal brushing.

Win10 version also doesn't make to the regular avx
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: MQN

Post by jesuscheung »

Aleg wrote: The JC-Mod is not capable of showing details in high frequencies like delicate cymbals playing with brushes.
It gives a strange distorted kind of sound instead of clear cymbal brushing.

Win10 version also doesn't make to the regular avx
yes, that sounds about right. jitter is worsened.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: MQN

Post by jesuscheung »

John Dot wrote:
jesuscheung wrote: PE mod.
agility better. fast notes better.
did try tighten sound further my machine cannot handle.
Don't know if you have SBGK's permission to mod his code, but this one sounds fantastic!
is the MOD too tight sound? can loosen it.
some setups(aleg's?) need less tight sound they cannot handle it
guess is the same idea as lowest buffer not all setups can handle
Aleg
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:26 pm

Re: MQN

Post by Aleg »

jesuscheung wrote:
Aleg wrote: The JC-Mod is not capable of showing details in high frequencies like delicate cymbals playing with brushes.
It gives a strange distorted kind of sound instead of clear cymbal brushing.

Win10 version also doesn't make to the regular avx
yes, that sounds about right. jitter is worsened.
Not a recommended MOD if it increases jitter.
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
nige2000
Posts: 4253
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:47 am
Location: meath

Re: MQN

Post by nige2000 »

8.16 avx2 mod would be more useful
what is it a 64?
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: MQN

Post by jesuscheung »

nige2000 wrote:8.16 avx2 mod would be more useful
what is it a 64?
wait me... let me mod 8.16 avx2... is this the version?

i mod based on how tight my setup can handle...
the original size for 99.9% of software is 1000 hex stack commit size

half = 800
half again = 400
....200, 100, 80,
until 40 my setup cannot handle it with mqn...

the effect is similer to lowering buffer size

basically smaller = tighter sound

shall mod this 8.16 avx2 later

am busy now

---
the effect is 100% better for piano notes. it needs agility and speed.
for vocal, could be worse(or better in my case), depending on how crap is your OS

think this mod needs tuning based on individual setup....

please learn PE mod... do it yourself
Aleg
Posts: 1381
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:26 pm

Re: MQN

Post by Aleg »

JC posted elsewhere
all earlier MODs use pkshan stack heap.
i feel that his mod is tuned for long duration note body, e.g. violin, vocal.
cannot handle fast notes with accuracy. agility is always lesser.
This is not a direction I would want to go to.

I want more agility and not less.
HDPLEX;picoPSU;ASUS Q87M;i7-4770T;PH SR7EHD;Server2012R2;Thesycon 2.24;
JCAT USB;Sonicweld DiverterHR2;Naim DC1;Chord Hugo;Morrow Audio MA6;Naim NAC-282,SuperCapDR;NAP-300;
AQ Cinnamon;GISO GB;Netgear Pro+XM21X;Cisco SG300;NAS-ZFS.
rickmcinnis
Posts: 587
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 10:01 pm

Re: MQN

Post by rickmcinnis »

JC,

I must have missed the "PE mod".

Is this referring to PROCESS EXPLORER?

If so, that is a great introduction into registry reduction. And can be a great way to destroy an installation, too.

What was the MOD?
phonograph, amplifiers & speakers
Post Reply