Tír Na HiFi

jesuscheung wrote:shall be the best vocal of all versions! prefer 2.50. emotion is totally natural. more air. vocal vibration better.
at first, i thought 2.48 has more emotion. but after careful listening, 2.50 is actually natural. 2.48's emotion is 0.05% intense. easy to confuse good SQ with best SQ!

2.50 could be the first version without any digital intensity!!

need more listening.

sometime can feel emotion by non-correct sound with intense of non-correct tempo, but listener will be more tired when long time listening. better with best SQ, natural intensity, true musical emotion.

love the 2.50. favorite! most natural+transparent sound. rock is great. vocal is great. piano is great.

2.50 + ramdisk + ntfs 64K cluster size sounds great. best width! smooth. everything seems kept.

height is most correct. keep it!

these few days my OS tuning went really well. difficult treble starts to sound ok. together using 2.50 sounds natural, sweet, airy and elegant. i have not had less ear pain! just great

uploaded 2.50mod. sounds ok.

i think happy xmas. can rest! enjoy music

jesuscheung wrote:love the 2.50. favorite! most natural+transparent sound. rock is great. vocal is great. piano is great.

2.50 + ramdisk + ntfs 64K cluster size sounds great. best width! smooth. everything seems kept.

height is most correct. keep it!

these few days my OS tuning went really well. difficult treble starts to sound ok. together using 2.50 sounds natural, sweet, airy and elegant. i have not had less ear pain! just great

uploaded 2.50mod. sounds ok.

i think happy xmas. can rest! enjoy music

happy xmas to you!

2.50mod very good, much improved vibration, and emotion also. original not much emotion as mod version. feel natural, elegant vocal. so much like its elegant!
v2.48 good sounds on my laptop, most emotional, feel passion of vocal and rhythm.will back to its code, maybe better optimize again.

read file method have very simple programing code, there's does'nt negative affect to RAM (do not need memory manipulation), i see sound is correct, only not much vibration.

uploaded v1.13.1 read file, v1.14 read file.

try them and compare with v2.xx. feel very good, soundstage and weight more correct, good vocal focus and musical emotion.
with read file method better with deffragmented HDD, use RamDisk support, of course SSD is best.

lekt wrote:read file method have very simple programing code, there's does'nt negative affect to RAM (do not need memory manipulation), i see sound is correct, only not much vibration.

uploaded v1.13.1 read file, v1.14 read file.

try them and compare with v2.xx. feel very good, soundstage and weight more correct, good vocal focus and musical emotion.
with read file method better with deffragmented HDD, use RamDisk support, of course SSD is best.

1.13.1 and 1.14
-natural sound kept. height kept. air kept.
-stronger also more texture/substance than 2.50.
-prefer hdd>ramdisk. i guess driver>speed. intel driver vs ramdisk driver
-1.14 overall better
-1.13.1 better in softness
-2.50 gives me this complete and full feeling. 1.14 1% less.

overall prefer 2.50. 1.14 is better in a few ways. 2.50 is dreamy. 1.1x is moving towards real/live. either is good for me. (for real/live/analog, there is big competition with old mqn.exe)

jesuscheung wrote:...overall prefer 2.50. 1.14 is better in a few ways. 2.50 is dreamy. 1.1x is moving towards real/live. either is good for me.

one different: sound height. v2.50 more height, return especially elegant effect. v1.13.1 and v1.14 (and v2.48 also) lesser height, emotion not elegant as v2.50 but have passion with good rhythm, and vocal focus more correct.

what height is correct? see v2.50 sound height a bit more than XA, mqn, Jplay,...
OK, im learning code of v2.48 and optimizing. maybe v2.50 sound height is already correct.

lekt wrote:

jesuscheung wrote:...overall prefer 2.50. 1.14 is better in a few ways. 2.50 is dreamy. 1.1x is moving towards real/live. either is good for me.

one different: sound height. v2.50 more height, return especially elegant effect. v1.13.1 and v1.14 (and v2.48 also) lesser height, emotion not elegant as v2.50 but have passion with good rhythm, and vocal focus more correct.

what height is correct? see v2.50 sound height a bit more than XA, mqn, Jplay,...
OK, im learning code of v2.48 and optimizing. maybe v2.50 sound height is already correct.

XA is tested with stax lambda
mqn is tested with pink floyd speaker

maybe -0.5%height?

jesuscheung wrote:

lekt wrote:

jesuscheung wrote:...overall prefer 2.50. 1.14 is better in a few ways. 2.50 is dreamy. 1.1x is moving towards real/live. either is good for me.

one different: sound height. v2.50 more height, return especially elegant effect. v1.13.1 and v1.14 (and v2.48 also) lesser height, emotion not elegant as v2.50 but have passion with good rhythm, and vocal focus more correct.

what height is correct? see v2.50 sound height a bit more than XA, mqn, Jplay,...
OK, im learning code of v2.48 and optimizing. maybe v2.50 sound height is already correct.

XA is tested with stax lambda
mqn is tested with pink floyd speaker

maybe -0.5%height?

it means v2.50 height is 100% ? i can adjust height, found out method in code.

ok. i just carefully listened and compared. XA is correct in soundstage.

2.50's height should be 100%. it feels like main music is coming from top into my ear. should be from centre into my ear.

just need to move everything down a little. keep the height. i think

jesuscheung wrote:ok. i just carefully listened and compared. XA is correct in soundstage.

2.50's height should be 100%. it feels like main music is coming from top into my ear. should be from centre into my ear.

just need to move everything down a little. keep the height. i think

v2.50's height seem correct, JC.
sound must be rise up, expand to left and to right (but only not go down, it's bad). see mqn.exe nopgomemcpy good presents such sound, also have elegant vocal.
v2.50 is best lekt version, sound very nice rises up (think sound is'nt coming from top, here's rises up!). natural effect, natural emotion.