Tír Na HiFi

jrling wrote:

sbgk wrote:uploaded 7.63 24/96 ax2, it's got the recommended loop, does it solve any issues ?

7.64 maybe sounds better

Don't know as there are no Normal or 1644 updated versions?

Only Go(r)d(on) knows why MQn has turned into a high res player for avx lately.. sigh....

3daudio wrote:

jrling wrote:

sbgk wrote:uploaded 7.63 24/96 ax2, it's got the recommended loop, does it solve any issues ?

7.64 maybe sounds better

Don't know as there are no Normal or 1644 updated versions?

Only Go(r)d(on) knows why MQn has turned into a high res player for avx lately.. sigh....

It is because he has been listening to The Beach Boys ["God Only Knows"]?

Well, this cat is overwhelmed. Not yet dead, though.

I would not begin to understand how to use that.

That really can be made to do stuff one can do in PE Explorer? Looks more like the building blocks of your .exe.

rickmcinnis wrote:Well, this cat is overwhelmed. Not yet dead, though.

I would not begin to understand how to use that.

That really can be made to do stuff one can do in PE Explorer? Looks more like the building blocks of your .exe.

thought you were trying to understand the code

what are you using to see that things have changed ?

uploaded 7.67

set to unicode, though don't know if it will help.

24/96 because it gives the best indication of sq, avx2 because that's what I'm using and sounds best.

lot's going on with this one, takes on a life of it's own.

am using Amandine Beyer & Gli Incogniti The Four Seasons to test for echo

shall make a 16/44 version

1 setting was making it sound soft, 7.68 has more punch

uploaded 3 versions all real time priority, but with different thread priorities critical (slight loss of top end), highest and normal. Think normal sounds best so far. think critical is competing with system processes. highest a little bit as well.

7.67 no sound
7.68 has sound

So far 7.68 is, again, the best from the latest (didn't try only the 7.65) and obviously we are heading into the right direction.
7.68 avx2 rt norm has a bit better detail and the 7.68 avx2 has more body and deeper/stronger bass. Those two are my favourite ones and I can go with either of them.
Slightly I prefer the 7.68 avx2 rt norm.

On the other hand, comparing to the 5.14/2.97 we are still not there!
5.14(24/96) has still better details and clarity.

7.68 no sound now... what went wrong

back to 7.46

nige2000 wrote:

jesuscheung wrote:why 5ms... make it to 1 to 2ms or 32/64/96/128

Some dacs can't cope with 1ms

So this is a parameter that should be configurable, so each can choose a suitable value for his setup.

Aleg wrote:

nige2000 wrote:

jesuscheung wrote:why 5ms... make it to 1 to 2ms or 32/64/96/128

Some dacs can't cope with 1ms

So this is a parameter that should be configurable, so each can choose a suitable value for his setup.

rt high >rt norm
rt critical was a non runner pretty poor

definitely timing is better which helps resolution a little, reducing buffer size would help more but i think there must be something else not right

rt high 5ms would be nice?