Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 1:44 pm
why 5ms... make it to 1 to 2ms or 32/64/96/128
Some dacs can't cope with 1msjesuscheung wrote:why 5ms... make it to 1 to 2ms or 32/64/96/128
Some dacs can't cope with 1msjesuscheung wrote:why 5ms... make it to 1 to 2ms or 32/64/96/128
5ms is relax here too.nige2000 wrote: 5ms could be a working progress, think it was only Jonathan that found it sharp edged,
i find the extra resolution has a relaxed effect without loosing the detail,
yes it is less bass, surely theres a way round it?
Msi h81-e33 and i3 4130 cpuTioFrancotirdor wrote:Hi I have been following this forum for several months trying and testing MQN (Thanks Gordon for the great job!)
I could only run normal versions of it, however since MQN development tends to use only AVX2 I want to upgrade my current system to be able to enjoy MQN AVX2 versions as well.
At the same time and do not want to spend much money on it.
So I think about upgrading only my current iIntel processor from G2020 (LGA1155) to Intel i3 3220.
Although i3 3220 does not have AVX2 it has AVX and I see that some of you report that MQN AVX2 version works on Ivy AVX.
Guys, Gordon can you tell whether it should work and make sense from future MQN development perspective?
Thanks,
sbgk, just wondering what is the exact buffer size is this 5ms version?nige2000 wrote:Some dacs can't cope with 1msjesuscheung wrote:why 5ms... make it to 1 to 2ms or 32/64/96/128
Do you have less bass quanity with 5ms too?jesuscheung wrote:5ms is relax here too.nige2000 wrote: 5ms could be a working progress, think it was only Jonathan that found it sharp edged,
i find the extra resolution has a relaxed effect without loosing the detail,
yes it is less bass, surely theres a way round it?
sharp edged is a typical feature of win8/R2. probably OS was poorly configured and ks made it worst.
(back in win7, edges were non-existence. win7 has other issues... win7 bass win7 treble signature)
Mostly low bass lackingjesuscheung wrote:bass quantity is plentiful here. maybe lowest bass not enough
Yes the lack of micro detail is worryingthe bigger issues is tiny/micro details seem missing
but then, latest versions may have fixed it i wouldn't know... no sound...
Don't know as there are no Normal or 1644 updated versions?sbgk wrote:uploaded 7.63 24/96 ax2, it's got the recommended loop, does it solve any issues ?
7.64 maybe sounds better
I just saw the 7.65 in the end of the night! :( Will try tonight.nige2000 wrote:is resolution not still a problemsima66 wrote:Thanks, Gordon, for looking into this "clipping problem" and special thanks for fixing it! :)))
I never got a chance to listen the 7.63 because the 7.64 is a such big improvement (comparing to the latest 7.61) that I could not stop listening!
Huge step forward! :)
only ks with good resolution was the 5ms and the realtime version
dunno why were ignoring it instead of working with it