Page 576 of 804
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 8:51 pm
by sbgk
uploaded 7.63 24/96 ax2, it's got the recommended loop, does it solve any issues ?
7.64 maybe sounds better
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 10:10 pm
by jorm
sbgk wrote:uploaded 7.63 24/96 ax2, it's got the recommended loop, does it solve any issues ?
7.64 maybe sounds better
For Thesycon 2.20 with Ivy Bridge:Yes for both 2496 7.63 and 7.64 avx2. No clicks detected after a brief listening.Thanks!
For Audiophilleo:Unfortunately no,still distortion.
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 10:34 pm
by rickmcinnis
sbgk,
What are you using to modify your files?
When mqnplayer blossomed in size I thought I would see what was there with my old standby PE Explorer only to find it does not work with 64 bits but could look inside, slightly, with RESOURCE HACKER.
I see you have cleared all of the obvious junk out of there with the latest version.
BUT, I am curious what do you use with 64 bits files? Hoping for something that allows file slimming with SERVER but not damage the files like RESOURCE HACKER does. Also, hoping it is as easy to use as PE Explorer!
Do you remove all of the error reporting stuff? Assuming you start with something existing - if you make the whole thing up I would guess you do not put that stuff in to begin with!
Curiosity ....
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:03 pm
by sbgk
rickmcinnis wrote:sbgk,
What are you using to modify your files?
When mqnplayer blossomed in size I thought I would see what was there with my old standby PE Explorer only to find it does not work with 64 bits but could look inside, slightly, with RESOURCE HACKER.
I see you have cleared all of the obvious junk out of there with the latest version.
BUT, I am curious what do you use with 64 bits files? Hoping for something that allows file slimming with SERVER but not damage the files like RESOURCE HACKER does. Also, hoping it is as easy to use as PE Explorer!
Do you remove all of the error reporting stuff? Assuming you start with something existing - if you make the whole thing up I would guess you do not put that stuff in to begin with!
Curiosity ....
killed the cat
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download ... x?id=18989
vs 2013
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 3:46 am
by sima66
Thanks, Gordon, for looking into this "clipping problem" and special thanks for fixing it! :)))
I never got a chance to listen the 7.63 because the 7.64 is a such big improvement (comparing to the latest 7.61) that I could not stop listening!
Huge step forward! :)
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 6:49 am
by sbgk
sima66 wrote:Thanks, Gordon, for looking into this "clipping problem" and special thanks for fixing it! :)))
I never got a chance to listen the 7.63 because the 7.64 is a such big improvement (comparing to the latest 7.61) that I could not stop listening!
Huge step forward! :)
you didn't spot 7.65 ?
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 10:40 am
by nige2000
sima66 wrote:Thanks, Gordon, for looking into this "clipping problem" and special thanks for fixing it! :)))
I never got a chance to listen the 7.63 because the 7.64 is a such big improvement (comparing to the latest 7.61) that I could not stop listening!
Huge step forward! :)
is resolution not still a problem
only ks with good resolution was the 5ms and the realtime version
dunno why were ignoring it instead of working with it
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:02 pm
by sbgk
nige2000 wrote:sima66 wrote:Thanks, Gordon, for looking into this "clipping problem" and special thanks for fixing it! :)))
I never got a chance to listen the 7.63 because the 7.64 is a such big improvement (comparing to the latest 7.61) that I could not stop listening!
Huge step forward! :)
is resolution not still a problem
only ks with good resolution was the 5ms and the realtime version
dunno why were ignoring it instead of working with it
there was feedback that 5ms was sharp edged, I found it lacked bass, realtime is still open to debate and is configurable so not an issue.
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:49 pm
by nige2000
sbgk wrote:nige2000 wrote:sima66 wrote:Thanks, Gordon, for looking into this "clipping problem" and special thanks for fixing it! :)))
I never got a chance to listen the 7.63 because the 7.64 is a such big improvement (comparing to the latest 7.61) that I could not stop listening!
Huge step forward! :)
is resolution not still a problem
only ks with good resolution was the 5ms and the realtime version
dunno why were ignoring it instead of working with it
there was feedback that 5ms was sharp edged, I found it lacked bass, realtime is still open to debate and is configurable so not an issue.
5ms could be a working progress, think it was only Jonathan that found it sharp edged,
i find the extra resolution has a relaxed effect without loosing the detail,
yes it is less bass, surely theres a way round it?
Re: MQN
Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2014 1:42 pm
by TioFrancotirdor
Hi I have been following this forum for several months trying and testing MQN (Thanks Gordon for the great job!)
I could only run normal versions of it, however since MQN development tends to use only AVX2 I want to upgrade my current system to be able to enjoy MQN AVX2 versions as well.
At the same time and do not want to spend much money on it.
So I think about upgrading only my current iIntel processor from G2020 (LGA1155) to Intel i3 3220.
Although i3 3220 does not have AVX2 it has AVX and I see that some of you report that MQN AVX2 version works on Ivy AVX.
Guys, Gordon can you tell whether it should work and make sense from future MQN development perspective?
Thanks,