Page 566 of 804
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 3:40 am
by jesuscheung
v93 0.005 is goood
possible to push buffer lower?
let's say 64/44100=about 1.5ms
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 10:53 am
by nige2000
jesuscheung wrote:v93 0.005 is goood
possible to push buffer lower?
let's say 64/44100=about 1.5ms
yea i really really liked it too
weight is good
sounds more relaxed fluid than wasapi yet a shade more detailed
adjustable buffer maybe
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 11:20 am
by Ken Moreland
V93 0.005 is very good on 16/44 and also on 24/192 too.
KM
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 12:50 pm
by cvrle59
Ken Moreland wrote:V93 0.005 is very good on 16/44 and also on 24/192 too.
KM
What player are you using for 24/192?
Edit:
I just noticed that there is 7.41 24/192, I got to give it blast tonight....
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 2:59 pm
by Ken Moreland
Hi George,
mqnplay24192 7.41avx2 issued on Sept 4 with control 3.64 , it really is very good.
mqnplay2488 7.41avx2 issued on the same day has a line missing so it doesn't work unless you use tasker/loader and mqncontrol 3.65, although it overcame this problem has a different fault giving a loud blast of white noise to test your alertness. One of these issues will be fixed soon I hope and we can dive into 24/88 stuff.
KM
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 3:24 pm
by Aleg
Ken Moreland wrote:Hi George,
mqnplay24192 7.41avx2 issued on Sept 4 with control 3.64 , it really is very good.
mqnplay2488 7.41avx2 issued on the same day has a line missing so it doesn't work unless you use tasker/loader and mqncontrol 3.65, although it overcame this problem has a different fault giving a loud blast of white noise to test your alertness. One of these issues will be fixed soon I hope and we can dive into 24/88 stuff.
KM
Hi Ken
You can use mqnplay2488 7.41avx2 with loader and mqncontrol
3.64 just fine.
The mqnloader will circumvent the issue of the missing copy-statement.
So I use MQNLoad with mqnplay2488 7.41avx2 + mqncontrol
3.64 + tasker.bat for the 88.2 kHz and the regular mqn-aff.bat with 3.64 + 7.41 for the rest of the sample rates.
No issues, just have to know I'm dealing with 88.2 before playback
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 3:38 pm
by Ken Moreland
Thanks for that Aleg, I will do it if it doesn't get fixed. I'd prefer simply using mqn.bat if possible but I'll giveita try next week.
KM
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 3:56 pm
by Aleg
V94 is a bad one, dropped it from my library after listening to it a few times.
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 3:58 pm
by sima66
The details are incredible in the v93 0.005. A bit more body wouldn't harm, but even this way so far it's my #1.
Finally with the v93 0.005 I'm starting to enjoy the HiRez again in KS!
Re: MQN
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 4:12 pm
by cvrle59
sima66 wrote:The details are incredible in the v93 0.005. A bit more body wouldn't harm, but even this way so far it's my #1.
Finally with the v93 0.005 I'm starting to enjoy the HiRez again in KS!
I didn't try v93 0.005, I just tried straight avx2 version, so I liked v91 better. I need to try 0.005, obviously.