Page 565 of 804

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:16 pm
by sbgk
v93 is v91 + 1 new setting as the second one didn't improve things, I think it's more of a live sound.

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:24 pm
by nige2000
Good micro detail in 0.001 lost weight though
Maybe a 0.005 might work
Cache is better than the other one
Not tested pa93
Reverted to 6.16 wasapi lost dynamics and detail in 6.18

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:27 pm
by nige2000
93 good
Pa93 5 ms please

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:34 pm
by Aleg
sbgk wrote:v93 is v91 + 1 new setting as the second one didn't improve things, I think it's more of a live sound.
+1

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:43 pm
by sbgk
nige2000 wrote:93 good
Pa93 5 ms please
there now

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:54 pm
by Aleg
sbgk wrote:
nige2000 wrote:93 good
Pa93 5 ms please
there now
+1

Pa93 5ms too edgy, too sharply carved. Prefer Pa93 standard.

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:21 pm
by sbgk
Aleg wrote:
sbgk wrote:
nige2000 wrote:93 good
Pa93 5 ms please
there now
+1

Pa93 5ms too edgy, too sharply carved. Prefer Pa93 standard.
la même chose

that's the last I'm doing with portaudio, next version will be mqnplay/control only (if I can get it working)

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 10:28 pm
by nige2000
Aleg wrote:
sbgk wrote:
nige2000 wrote:93 good
Pa93 5 ms please
there now
+1

Pa93 5ms too edgy, too sharply carved. Prefer Pa93 standard.
Didn't get testing the 5ms but the 1 ms was very fluid with no edge
Prob something to do with jitter and usb to i2s interaction
Actually heard some detail I never heard before (not noise before you ask)
Anyway it will be good to lose the PA

Re: MQN

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 11:19 pm
by tony
Just testing v93 normal and just keep playing music. Detail, musical, I hear no issues with it at all.

Re: MQN

Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:39 am
by cvrle59
V91>V93