MQN

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

r buf
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

fer
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

give
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

s mor
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

noise.

there is an overhead in transferring the data, there is a wait call, write call, event reset, pointer increment and then if the kernel code is expecting 10ms batches of data that's another complication.

I've had small buffers in asio and think you're just listening to noise, yes it sounds more detailed, is it music ?
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: MQN

Post by jesuscheung »

i think steady stream > fast stream

that might explain why chord dac sounds better with extra buffering (or just overhead?!)
nige2000
Posts: 4253
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:47 am
Location: meath

Re: MQN

Post by nige2000 »

jesuscheung wrote:i think steady stream > fast stream

that might explain why chord dac sounds better with extra buffering (or just overhead?!)
buffer size could just be an attempt to cure the jitter. regroup etc, prob still a balance thing but still an overhead too

the whole system is still terribly flawed, otherwise we could stream direct?
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: MQN

Post by jesuscheung »

nige2000 wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:i think steady stream > fast stream

that might explain why chord dac sounds better with extra buffering (or just overhead?!)
buffer size could just be an attempt to cure the jitter. regroup etc, prob still a balance thing but still an overhead too

the whole system is still terribly flawed, otherwise we could stream direct?
sgbk, possible to make a version of like buffer=64 anyway? very interested to see what that sounds like
User avatar
minionas
Posts: 101
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 6:45 am
Location: Lithuania

Re: MQN

Post by minionas »

Are you guys listening to the latest mqn's with mmcs or without?
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: MQN

Post by jesuscheung »

minionas wrote:Are you guys listening to the latest mqn's with mmcs or without?
clockrate in mmcss is still improving sound. not letting go mmcss
Post Reply