Page 560 of 804

Re: MQN

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 4:28 am
by jesuscheung
v89 better.

does v89 seem to tight?

Re: MQN

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 11:53 am
by nige2000
jesuscheung wrote:v89 better.

does v89 seem to tight?

PA 89 good step forward
Peg in the ground moment

Re: MQN

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 1:31 pm
by jkeny
Is PA 89 now at a level or surpassing previous MQN non PA versions?

Re: MQN

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 1:49 pm
by jkeny
nige2000 wrote:Yea it's more likely to be a mobo CLK
But which one the usb clk the mobo master CLK or the realtime clk
Because their replacement all provide a similar increase in sq
But I never got the three replacements to work simultaneously well not reliably anyhow
I believe jitter in timing has a knock on effect
Oh, I thought you had replaced the 3 clocks on your mobo, successfully? (after a couple of "puff the magic dragon" moments) :)

Re: MQN

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 2:04 pm
by nige2000
Nope
Not surpassed wasapi for me yet
Resolution dynamics definition not just there yet

Well ive the 25 mhz main clk the 32.768 kHz realtime clk and the 24 mhz usb clk on the usb card done
I failed to get the 24mhz operating system clk working reliably
Though it did sound awesome

Re: MQN

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 2:33 pm
by sbgk
jesuscheung wrote:v89 better.

does v89 seem to tight?
v90 might be better in that regard

Re: MQN

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 7:09 pm
by jrling
sbgk wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:v89 better.

does v89 seem to tight?
v90 might be better in that regard
For me v89>v87 because it is tighter. By that I mean tighter bass which surely is to be desired? v89 also brought a more defined upper treble which v87 lacked slightly.

v90 just loosened the bass.

v89 is my new reference (with 7.41 Normal).

Re: MQN

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 7:25 pm
by nige2000
jrling wrote:
sbgk wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:v89 better.

does v89 seem to tight?
v90 might be better in that regard
For me v89>v87 because it is tighter. By that I mean tighter bass which surely is to be desired? v89 also brought a more defined upper treble which v87 lacked slightly.

v90 just loosened the bass.

v89 is my new reference (with 7.41 Normal).
Yea that's what I thought too
I'd but too tight in the same category along with too much accuracy, money and sex

Re: MQN

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 10:17 pm
by Fran
OK lads,


I've lost track of this over the last few months - been working hard on other stuff. Now its back to some CA catchup time.

I'm back on a version of MQn from earlier in the year - I think its 2.73 and running server 2012 on a zuma PC with some separate PSU but not as good as it could be. I'd like to be able to play 24/96 etc. What is the correct newer version for me to use?


fran

Re: MQN

Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2014 10:34 pm
by nige2000
Fran wrote:OK lads,


I've lost track of this over the last few months - been working hard on other stuff. Now its back to some CA catchup time.

I'm back on a version of MQn from earlier in the year - I think its 2.73 and running server 2012 on a zuma PC with some separate PSU but not as good as it could be. I'd like to be able to play 24/96 etc. What is the correct newer version for me to use?


fran
did you try that one from tuesday?
might need to fiddle with run with admin rights on the control file

i doubt the one im using will work on the intel h77 board
think adam posted a link to his 5.14 avx2 few pages back
the ks is getting good too