MQN

Anything to do with computer audio, hardware, software etc.
jesuscheung
Posts: 2491
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:09 pm

Re: MQN

Post by jesuscheung »

v89 better.

does v89 seem to tight?
nige2000
Posts: 4253
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:47 am
Location: meath

Re: MQN

Post by nige2000 »

jesuscheung wrote:v89 better.

does v89 seem to tight?

PA 89 good step forward
Peg in the ground moment
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
jkeny
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 9:37 pm

Re: MQN

Post by jkeny »

Is PA 89 now at a level or surpassing previous MQN non PA versions?
www.Ciunas.biz
For Digital Audio playback that delivers WHERE the performers are on stage but more importantly WHY they are there.
jkeny
Posts: 2387
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 9:37 pm

Re: MQN

Post by jkeny »

nige2000 wrote:Yea it's more likely to be a mobo CLK
But which one the usb clk the mobo master CLK or the realtime clk
Because their replacement all provide a similar increase in sq
But I never got the three replacements to work simultaneously well not reliably anyhow
I believe jitter in timing has a knock on effect
Oh, I thought you had replaced the 3 clocks on your mobo, successfully? (after a couple of "puff the magic dragon" moments) :)
www.Ciunas.biz
For Digital Audio playback that delivers WHERE the performers are on stage but more importantly WHY they are there.
nige2000
Posts: 4253
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:47 am
Location: meath

Re: MQN

Post by nige2000 »

Nope
Not surpassed wasapi for me yet
Resolution dynamics definition not just there yet

Well ive the 25 mhz main clk the 32.768 kHz realtime clk and the 24 mhz usb clk on the usb card done
I failed to get the 24mhz operating system clk working reliably
Though it did sound awesome
Last edited by nige2000 on Sun Sep 07, 2014 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
sbgk
Posts: 1950
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:45 pm

Re: MQN

Post by sbgk »

jesuscheung wrote:v89 better.

does v89 seem to tight?
v90 might be better in that regard
jrling
Posts: 398
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 7:54 pm
Location: London

Re: MQN

Post by jrling »

sbgk wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:v89 better.

does v89 seem to tight?
v90 might be better in that regard
For me v89>v87 because it is tighter. By that I mean tighter bass which surely is to be desired? v89 also brought a more defined upper treble which v87 lacked slightly.

v90 just loosened the bass.

v89 is my new reference (with 7.41 Normal).
Maplin XM21X 12V float charging A123 26650 LiFePO4 battery/Maxwell Supercap PSU for Mitac PD10-BI J1900 Bay Trail, WTFPlay, Hiface Evo, Bow Technologies 1704 NOS DAC, StereoKnight TVC, Quad II monoblocks, ZU Audio Druid Mk4/Method Sub
nige2000
Posts: 4253
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:47 am
Location: meath

Re: MQN

Post by nige2000 »

jrling wrote:
sbgk wrote:
jesuscheung wrote:v89 better.

does v89 seem to tight?
v90 might be better in that regard
For me v89>v87 because it is tighter. By that I mean tighter bass which surely is to be desired? v89 also brought a more defined upper treble which v87 lacked slightly.

v90 just loosened the bass.

v89 is my new reference (with 7.41 Normal).
Yea that's what I thought too
I'd but too tight in the same category along with too much accuracy, money and sex
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
User avatar
Fran
Site Admin
Posts: 4127
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 10:03 pm

Re: MQN

Post by Fran »

OK lads,


I've lost track of this over the last few months - been working hard on other stuff. Now its back to some CA catchup time.

I'm back on a version of MQn from earlier in the year - I think its 2.73 and running server 2012 on a zuma PC with some separate PSU but not as good as it could be. I'd like to be able to play 24/96 etc. What is the correct newer version for me to use?


fran
Do or do not, there is no try
nige2000
Posts: 4253
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:47 am
Location: meath

Re: MQN

Post by nige2000 »

Fran wrote:OK lads,


I've lost track of this over the last few months - been working hard on other stuff. Now its back to some CA catchup time.

I'm back on a version of MQn from earlier in the year - I think its 2.73 and running server 2012 on a zuma PC with some separate PSU but not as good as it could be. I'd like to be able to play 24/96 etc. What is the correct newer version for me to use?


fran
did you try that one from tuesday?
might need to fiddle with run with admin rights on the control file

i doubt the one im using will work on the intel h77 board
think adam posted a link to his 5.14 avx2 few pages back
the ks is getting good too
sd card player, modded soekris dac, class a lifepo4 amp or gb class a/b amp, diy open baffle speakers based on project audio mundorf trio 10's
Post Reply