Page 6 of 13
Re: It didn't explode....... YET (aka niges amp)
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 2:17 pm
by nige2000
im inclined to go 1:1 but 1:1.6 is fine too if theres no negative effects
Re: It didn't explode....... YET (aka niges amp)
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 2:26 pm
by abraxalito
1:1.6 has the advantage you can turn it round if you ever need 4dB attenuation. 1:1 is boring in comparison...
Re: It didn't explode....... YET (aka niges amp)
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 2:28 pm
by nige2000
lol
wouldnt want to be boring:)
Re: It didn't explode....... YET (aka niges amp)
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:00 pm
by nige2000
Re: transformer build thread
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:39 am
by abraxalito
If they're making them then we can specify much smaller diameter wire and hence use smaller cores. Want to give it a go?
Re: transformer build thread
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 1:04 am
by jkeny
abraxalito wrote:If they're making them then we can specify much smaller diameter wire and hence use smaller cores. Want to give it a go?
Sounds like a good plan depending on their pricing
Would same spec transformer be needed for PCM5102 DAC output?
What about TDA1387 DAC output (probably buffer before it?)
Re: transformer build thread
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 1:18 am
by abraxalito
Let's list the requirements and see how many we can fulfill with one trafo, it can have a few taps (depending on the bobbin's complement of pins).
So do we want only unbalanced output and 2VRMS? Or how about allowing 1VRMS output for better compatibility with direct feeds into poweramps (where the DAC's the volume control) ?
Then the primary needs to be at least 2VRMS but perhaps 4VRMS if you're using balanced DACs in anti-phase.
Re: transformer build thread
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 1:37 am
by jkeny
abraxalito wrote:Let's list the requirements and see how many we can fulfill with one trafo, it can have a few taps (depending on the bobbin's complement of pins).
So do we want only unbalanced output and 2VRMS? Or how about allowing 1VRMS output for better compatibility with direct feeds into poweramps (where the DAC's the volume control) ?
Then the primary needs to be at least 2VRMS but perhaps 4VRMS if you're using balanced DACs in anti-phase.
Good questions. Got a stinker of a cold & heading o bed. Will mull over & get back to it tomorrow.
Re: transformer build thread
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 11:11 am
by jkeny
Can't a trafo perform balanced & single ended duties by connecting the two side of the secondary balanced windings in series?
What are the design restrains to doing this?
Re: transformer build thread
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 11:30 am
by nige2000
abraxalito wrote:Let's list the requirements and see how many we can fulfill with one trafo, it can have a few taps (depending on the bobbin's complement of pins).
So do we want only unbalanced output and 2VRMS? Or how about allowing 1VRMS output for better compatibility with direct feeds into poweramps (where the DAC's the volume control) ?
Then the primary needs to be at least 2VRMS but perhaps 4VRMS if you're using balanced DACs in anti-phase.
would a power amp not need more than 1vrms, would have assumed that would be approx where moderate vol levels would be
surely would be safer going with 2vrms output transformers?
i doubt we will be using balanced dacs in anti-phase any time soon